<Anchor> The

National Assembly is expected to have a follow-up legislative process related to real estate ahead of the plenary session tomorrow (4th). The law between the opposition parties is getting hotter, saying that the charter will disappear faster with the enforcement of the Rent 3 Act.

Reporter Kim Soo-young reports.

<Reporter> The

Democratic Party, which pushed forward the legislation for the lease of the lease and the lease for the renewal of rent and lease, tries to revise the remaining real estate laws today and tomorrow.

The Democratic Party is planning to finalize the bills including the'pre-war and monthly rent reporting system' and strengthen the comprehensive real estate tax at the judiciary committee today and pass through the plenary session held tomorrow.

Regarding the bill, the opposition party's workshop is continuing, but on the 30th of last month, the reunification of Yun Hee-suk, the unification party, began.

[Yoon Hee-suk/Reunion Party of the Future (30th of the last month): Many people prefer to charter. But because of this law, it was forced to enter the path of extinction too quickly (the charter system).] When the

captain Yoon's captain shook, the ruling party members launched an attack.

Democratic Party lawmaker Jun Jun-byeong wrote on social media and questioned, "Isn't it a bad thing to turn a charter into a monthly rent?"

"It's the same as paying the landlord's rent to the landlord or lending interest to the bank," he said. "In the low-interest era, the rent is easier than the rent."

Assemblyman Park Bum-gye refuted Rep. Hee-suk Yoon's claim that landlords would be able to bring their children into the rented house without rent, saying, "It is impossible to take out the deposit and return it."

In response, the United Nations Party said that it is common sense that monthly rent is much more burdensome than in the low-interest era.