Looks and Abras Coup, confrontation, or revolution?

The old question is still constantly renewed, whenever a new disaster arises, a conflict erupts, the situation becomes complicated, the impotence and corruption exacerbate, and the accumulation of negligence and defeat: When does this dark chapter of the history of our Arab nation end? When does tyranny end to open the door wide for justice, development, development, innovation, and building bridges of cooperation and integration between the rival parts of the nation?

What the Arab region is witnessing in the current stage among them in terms of conflicts, divisions, splits, oppression, killing and abuse is unthinkable, and unilaterally it does not find an analogy in the world, and we mentioned earlier that the responsible for all this is tyranny, so how can we get rid of this ghoul who Perched on the chest of the nation for decades, it was tasted with bitterness and misery. To answer this question, we must familiarize yourself with the methods and methods used previously and presently to achieve this.

 Ways to get rid of tyranny

Over the past seventy years, the Arab region has witnessed many methods and methods used by its owners to seize power, whether to get rid of tyranny or for other reasons, the most prominent of these methods are as follows:

1- Military coups

About 125 coups and coup attempts witnessed by the Arab countries since independence until now, including 40 successful coups and more than 80 failed attempts, none of which resulted in reform, development and transition in the state and the nation to the desired position, not all of them aiming to get rid of tyranny, many of them were for the purpose of Seizing power; Some of them were a coup against the few attempts to democratize, such as the coup of Lieutenant General Ibrahim Abboud against the coalition democratic government between the Umma and Federal parties in Sudan in 1958. Morsi is the first elected Egyptian president.

Coups are the most common way, given the ease of their implementation and their ability to resolve, and the speed of their control over power if successful. Many Arab countries have witnessed many military coups, in Yemen, Libya, Sudan, Iraq, Syria, Algeria and Tunisia, and even the genetic systems have not escaped this.

Usually, this method is used in the last stage of the life of the despotic regime, and it is from within the system itself at the hands of the armed forces or security services, similar to the coup of former Tunisian President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali against his predecessor President Habib Bourguiba in 1987, or through opponent groups that hide Herself inside the regime’s apparatus is awaiting the appropriate opportunity to get rid of it, similar to the coup of Field Marshal Abdel Rahman Swar Al-Dahab against former Sudanese President Jaafar Nimeiri in 1985.

40 coups in the Arab countries since independence, none of which resulted in reform, development, and the transition of the state and the nation to the desired position; Rather, not all of them were aiming to get rid of tyranny, many of them were just for the seizure of power with ideological motives, and some were a coup against democracy, and the coupists quickly reproduced the old tyranny with new names and faces, and with bright slogans, the people soon discovered their falsehood and deception, and succumbed to their suppression He was stripped.

Soon the revolutionaries will reproduce the old tyranny with new names and faces, and with glamorous slogans, the people soon discover its falsehood and deception, and succumb to its suppression and oppression. Rather, it laid the foundations for a democratic phase that transferred power to political parties through election funds.

السياسية- Political confrontation

In this scenario, some right-wing or left-wing elite vanguards, organized or independent, begin to oppose the regime and call for its overthrow and replacement, and urges the masses to confront it, using peaceful means guaranteed by law and the constitution, such as freedom of opinion, expression, and demonstration; But the domineering regime that dominates everything does not recognize these rights, and does not accept these actions for fear that they will lead to its collapse, thus stifling the opposition, opposing all kinds of oppression and abuse, and accusing it of the most severe accusations of working to undermine security and destabilize the country, to betray the homeland Working on behalf of external parties, and he is severely sentenced to hard labor or life imprisonment, and sometimes direct or indirect execution.

In the face of this repression, terror spread in the issuance of those who remained outside the prisons from the opposition, so their internal activities calmed down, and they infiltrated outside the state to start the opposition from the outside strongly, as the iron regime's grip did not reach it, and they began working to expose the regime's authoritarian practices and the definition of its human crimes, in order to win the attention of the organizations International and legal and countries with significant political influence in the international community.

The political confrontation has not succeeded in overthrowing any despotic regime until now, whether from the inside or from the outside, as the interior turns into a hell chasing the opposition in every corner of the country, and the outside turns into a shelter that exploits the presence of the opposition to achieve its interests in pressuring the tyrannical regime to provide more Political, security, military and economic concessions.

Despite its repetition and the multiplicity of its models, in Egypt, Iraq, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Sudan and Yemen ... this political confrontation has not succeeded in overthrowing any despotic regime until now, whether from the inside or from the outside, so that the interior turns into a hell chasing the opposition in every corner of the homeland, And the outside is turning into a shelter that exploits the presence of the opposition to achieve its interests in pressuring the despotic regime to make more political, security, military and economic concessions.

المسلحة- Armed confrontation

In all the experiences that the Arab region witnessed, this method proved its failure to get rid of the tyrannical regime, and this method is the most severe for the country that becomes threatened with the loss of its strategic security, and the people who pay the price of armed confrontations, while the authoritarian regime exploits the armed opposition card to enhance its authority and confirm its credibility In front of the people that it is facing terrorist terrorist groups that implement foreign plans targeting the stability of the country and the security of citizens.

The armed opposition turns into an open arena for the intelligence of regional and international countries, their conflicting agendas, and their interlocking interests. The opposition in this case needs money, arms, and political support, all of which are in the hands of regional and international powers that do not provide anything of them for free, and the opposition’s goals soon to hide the tyrannical regime behind The goals and agendas of regional and international parties that manage the scene and control the course of events.

On the other hand, the opposition turns into an open arena for the intelligence of regional and international countries, their conflicting agendas, and their interlocking interests. The opposition in this case needs money, arms, and political support, all of which are in the hands of regional and international powers that do not provide anything of them for free, and the opposition’s objectives are quickly hidden to overthrow the regime The tyrant behind the goals and agendas of the regional and international parties that manage the scene, and control the course of events, the current evidence around us many, in Egypt, Iraq, Yemen, Libya and Syria, and the catastrophic results left by these armed confrontations - are still - too much to count.

4- The popular revolution

The popular revolution is a misleading term, and the correct one is that it is a spontaneous popular movement, characterized by chaos and improvisation, and it is lacking in organization, and is controlled by emotion and anger, and it is quick to fear and not ready to sacrifice. Security and military strength.

It usually arises from a public reaction by the people in protest against some of the regime's practices, or its failure to provide the basic needs of the people, and this movement does not aim to overthrow the authoritarian regime, but rather seeks to achieve its demands and address its problems.

The popular movement is characterized by spontaneity, chaos, improvisation, shortness of breath, lacks organization, is controlled by emotion and anger, and is quick to fear and not ready to sacrifice, and can not lead a revolution capable of overthrowing a tyrannical regime of oppression, unless it is exploited and led by internal, organized and capable forces On confrontation, sacrifice, and financing, or through external regional and international powers that want to overthrow the regime, which ultimately leads to the reproduction of the despotic regime on the scale of the forces or countries sponsoring the popular revolution.

This popular movement is exploited with its leadership through organized internal forces that have the ability to confront, sacrifice and finance in order to overthrow the regime, or through regional and international external powers that want to overthrow the regime, and this method will ultimately lead to the reproduction of the authoritarian regime on the scale of the countries sponsoring the popular revolution And from that what we witnessed in what is called (the Arab Spring), and more recently in Sudan, and we have seen the tragic results left by this method in the countries that witnessed it.

These are the most prominent ways that the Arab region has experienced and political forces and entities have tried for more than 70 years in their attempts to get rid of tyranny, and the results were what we have witnessed - and we are still witnessing - from disasters, tragedies, defeats, regression and failure, so shall we continue to try these methods again for seventy Another year, or are we looking for new ways that are less losses and better able to achieve the goals of the region and its peoples?