The representative of the Communist Party said courtesy in front of the dead. It became a dagger to the'liver' who managed to take courage. The Democratic Party has not been in the last five days. It was only a survivor who left the winter solstice. Tears shed tears at the person who tied his life, and the pain of the short bowels experienced by the living person was neglected.

Representative Lee Hae-chan of the Democratic Party held a public memorial service for Mayor Park Won-soon on the 10th, saying, “I wish you a good old friend, Goin, who has been with the democratization movement.” Democrats also participated enthusiastically. There is no light death in the world. This is especially true for the deceased who left a mark in society. Before death, mourning is Dori and cognitive. It is not difficult to understand that their sorrows that left their comrades eagerly were different.

However, another tragedy, even more pain, could have been created when only tribute was considered in this matter. The Democratic Party had to know this, but it didn't. At the closed meeting of the Democratic Party on the 10th, none of the leaders of the Democratic Party thought about the message that the funeral to be headed to the Seoul Metropolitan Government would throw. To be precise, I turned away.

Summarizing the words of the attendees of the meeting at the time, Lee said that he talked about the relationship with the deceased and said'Seoul Metropolitan City', and there was no discussion about the situation of the victim woman. He said he had no worries about the victim's suffering, which had to be helplessly looking at the site of the damage, the incense burner installed there.


● Question to the representative of the Gongdang… The Democratic Party's representative

, who responded to the survivor, started with a memorial day and ended with a memorial. There were no other public comments. It was a short meeting that took less than 5 minutes. Immediately after the meeting, a spokesperson also said, "It's not something that I can answer to myself." Other Democratic leadership was also silent.

And only a few hours later, the official position of the Democratic Party was established. The official method of conveying the position was a scream mixed with the swear words of the representatives. A reporter to Hae-chan Lee, who left the vacancy, asked, "Do you have any plans to respond to the suspicion of the deceased at the party level?" "That's not polite. xx child."

The question asked to the representative of the Gongdang, Hae-chan Lee answered as a survivor. As the representative of the GNP became a survivor, the leadership of the Democratic Party, such as Secretary General Yoon Ho-joong, chairman of the National Assembly's judiciary committee, and chairman of the mediation policy committee, were no longer accredited. Lee's profanity directed the reporter, but his remarks became the position of the ruling party, supporters and ruling party members. The word'not courteous' acted as the'do memorial' instruction. So the ruling party members closed their ears to the victim's voice.

Whether intended or unintended, the words of the'victim' within the ruling party became a taboo word with the words of Lee Hae-chan. 'Find out the truth or mention the victim' became rude. In the meantime, the second abuse has grown out of control. The work of harassing victims of sexual crimes, such as robbery, defamation, false information, ridicule, and malicious distortion, has been repeated.

Can the Democratic Party be confident that it didn't intend the results? Politicians' gestures, words, and gait were political acts and messages. Members of the assembly care about the details of setting up a separate message management team. If you can't predict these results, you are incompetent, and if you do, they are malicious.

The same place, the same question, the politicians of different political parties said, "It is the victim's complainant who may be the most painful in this situation. Please remember that this is not because of your responsibility." Was this short statement to the Democratic leadership so difficult? It was not compatible with the memory of the deceased and the comfort of the victim.


● The Democratic Party shouted and publicly shouted "victim of victims"…

Four months before the defamation they took out , Democrats voted for themselves in public. It was a kind of self-confession and commitment to sexual crimes, represented by'n-room'.

"The National Assembly should have taken a more active approach. In the reality of demanding'victims of victims', the victim is afraid to reveal even the facts of the damage. In order to create a real gender equality society with heavy responsibility based on victimism, the National Assembly and the ruling party I will do my part." (Rep. Paik Hye-ryun) It

didn't seem to be a quick reflection of the ruling party ahead of the election. The law was passed at the end of the 20th National Assembly and the results were released. However, these efforts have collapsed in the past five days. In the end, even in the mouth of the ruling party, the word'defamation of the lion, the principle of innocence estimation' appeared. "It was the defamation of Lions to make Mayor Park a perpetrator," he said. You might think it's the right word for law, but it was a misunderstanding of the nature of sexual crime stuck in our society. There was no sympathy for the victims of sex crimes.

In the meantime, defamation has been a means to impose silence on victims of sexual crime. The perpetrator tried to cover the crime with it. These are facts that the ruling party knew. For this reason, in the 20th National Assembly, Senator Jin Seon-mi, along with 18 members of the same party, said, "If you expose sexual violence damage, it may be defamatory even if the contents are true. Rather, it will falsify the confession. Yes, it proposed a law that excludes'assault of sexual violence' from defamation. Rep. Han Jeong-ae, along with 15 lawmakers, also proposed a similar measure, saying, "Let's protect the victims' complaints thickly."

The government also joined. President Moon Jae-in instructed on February 26, 2018, "to prepare measures so that victims who courageously disclose the damage are not subject to secondary damages or disadvantages." At that time, the president and ruling lawmakers were unaware of the'constitutional requirements of defamation' or'principles of innocence'. Rather, they were observing the nature of sexual crimes due to power relations. The assailant of superior status has been subjected to the second assault again in the name of defensive rights, and it was difficult for him to reveal the truth or to speak out. It was the reason that sex crime became a sex crime.

This was especially true of sexual crimes by hierarchies. From the occurrence of the crime to the identification of the substance, the victim did not escape the position of the weak. The President's orders were also taken in this context. It also meant listening to the victim's voice as much as the abuser's defense. However, in this situation, the Democratic Party moved in the opposite direction. The ruling party's pledge to shout "protecting victims, centering on victims" wasn't a principle, it was just a rubber band that varied from person to person.


● "I wanted to get an apple"… On the

13th, the funeral council chairman Lee Hae-chan of the Democratic Party, who had forgotten in commemoration, asked the victims who were preparing for the press conference, "Please reconsider the press conference regarding the deceased so that the survivors can fully spend time of tears." Civic groups such as the Korea Sexual Violence Counseling Center have not responded to the demand for "to oppose the time that victims can speak and the flow that society has to take away the responsibility to listen to it." The victim's suffering was thoroughly ignored.

Even in this situation, the victim's side made a voice. "I wanted to be protected by a fair and equal law in order to protect myself from weak and weak power before huge powers," he complained. "I wanted to yell at him not to do that. I wanted to be judged by the law in South Korea, and a human apology," he said.

To such a victim, a ruling party member unceasingly wrote, "The deceased person practiced the war crimes of death." 'Forgiveness' was a remark that even the basics of the victim's rights were unknown. In the past five days, the ruling party did not admit or try to understand that the deceased's choices even deprived the victims of "recovery opportunities and forgiveness."

● The Democratic Party that defended "victim of victims"… There was

only'Democratic Centralism '. However, Kim Hae-young, the highest commissioner, made a voice of magnetism asking for the first'reflection' toward the party on the 13th. On the 15th, President Hae-chan Lee apologized, not belatedly apologizing, "I would like to speak deeply to the suffering of the victim." He wrote the title of "victim of the victim," not "victim," and said, "It is difficult to investigate the facts realistically in the absence of the deceased." "Don't take advantage of our pain as a means of war and public opinion," he said. "The Democratic Party has steadfastly defended the

center of victimism." There was no reflection of the second abuse against the victim, and his suffering was considered independent of the Democratic Party. The allegations surrounding sexual assault were dismissed as a conflict. Adhering to the attitude of'death, the truth has become unknown,' handing over all the balls to the city of Seoul and keeping the distance from the Democratic Party.

There is no plan to install a fact-finding TF in the party, which was often created when all sorts of suspicions arose, and to utilize the permanent standing committee to converge and investigate all issues. 'No right to prosecution' means the end of the criminal justice process, but it does not mean that the process of finding the truth and recovering from the damage is also over. The Democratic Party said "victimism," but there was no "victim", only "democracyism."

For the Democratic Party, fact-finding can be frightening. Article 96 of the Democratic Party's Party Constitution states that'If a elected official belonging to the party loses his position due to a serious error, he will not be a candidate for the by-election.' There is no disagreement that sex crimes are included in the'critical error'. That's why the Democratic Party evades Seoul's mayoral election candidate next year without a clear answer.

Repetition of the phrase "difficulty due to death" is the reason why the word "victim" is used instead of the victim, and all of this is due to the fact that'democratist centralism' rather than'victim' has worked. What the Democrats are concerned about now is not the victims, but the Democrats themselves. Democrats do not have the will to reveal the truth or the courage to face the truth.

The Democratic Party declared'substantial gender equality','prevention and eradication of sexual crimes' and'a society where justice flows like a river' through the Code and Constitution. However, he forgot in honor. The Democratic Party hung a banner saying'I will remember your will' in front of the National Assembly. What do you remember and how?