China News Service, July 9th, according to the Supreme Law WeChat public account, on July 9, 2020, the Intermediate People's Court of Honghe Prefecture, Yunnan Province, in accordance with the execution order issued by the Supreme People's Court, intentionally killed February 6, 2020 according to law Ma Jianguo, two epidemic prevention and control staff, executed the death penalty. The procuratorial organ shall dispatch personnel to supervise on the spot.
On March 1, 2020, the Honghe Intermediate People's Court opened a court hearing in accordance with law on the case of the accused Ma Jianguo's intentional homicide and pronounced the case in court. He sentenced Ma Jianguo to death for deliberate homicide and deprived him of his political rights for life. After the verdict in the first instance, the defendant Ma Jianguo filed an appeal. The Yunnan Provincial High People's Court opened the hearing in accordance with the law. On March 30, 2020, it ruled to dismiss the appeal, uphold the original judgment, and report to the Supreme People's Court for approval in accordance with the law.
The Supreme People's Court reviewed that Ma Jianguo deliberately and illegally deprived others of his life, and his actions constituted intentional homicide. During the first-level response to major public health emergencies in Yunnan Province, Ma Jianguo refused to abide by the epidemic prevention policies and traffic control measures, and stabbed the epidemic prevention and control staff who carried out official duties, causing the death of two people. The plot was particularly bad and the social hazards were extremely harmful. The consequences are serious and the crimes are extremely serious, and he was sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment for committing the crime of intentional injury. Within five years after the execution of the punishment, he committed a crime of intentional homicide. It is a repeated offense. It is extremely subjective and extremely dangerous. . Although Ma Jianguo has a surrender plot, comprehensive consideration of the facts, nature, plot and degree of harm to society is not enough to punish lightly. The facts found in the first-instance judgment and the second-instance judgment are clear, the evidence is reliable and sufficient, the conviction is accurate, and the sentence is appropriate. The trial procedure is legal. The Supreme People's Court approved the Yunnan Provincial Higher People's Court to maintain the first-instance criminal ruling that the defendant Ma Jianguo was sentenced to death for deliberate homicide and deprived of political rights for life.
Before the execution of the death penalty, the Intermediate People's Court of Honghe Prefecture arranged for Ma Jianguo to meet with close relatives according to law, which fully protected the lawful rights and interests of the executed criminal.