The leader of the Al-Hikma Movement, Ammar Al-Hakim, announced on Tuesday the formation of a new political alliance in the name of "Iraqis", with the aim of strengthening the path of the state and law enforcement, meeting the demands of demonstrators and restoring confidence in the political system.
Analysts believe that the announcement of the new alliance comes after Iraq witnessed a relatively political stalemate, due to the crises that beset the country, which occupied the Iraqi street and the media about political movements, which raises several scenarios whether it is possible to throw a stone in the pool of recession next to the current Al-Kazemi moves.
Of the obsession with national responsibility, and on the centenary of the immortal revolution of twenty, we announce today the formation of a major parliamentary political coalition that stems from the state .. # Iraqi_Alliance pic.twitter.com/ouXy0pdj11
- Ammar Al-Hakim Ammar Al-Hakim (@Ammar_Alhakeem) June 30, 2020
Analysts and researchers in Iraqi affairs confirmed that the Hakim alliance will not differ from the previous political coalitions, and some described it as a "traditional coalition" and would not add new to the political reality in Iraq.
Labor difficult,
and the researcher Fadel Abu Ragheef believes that "an alliance (Iraqis) is like the remaining alliances that were born from the womb of the political process in Iraq," considering that "the new coalition was formed after a long and difficult labor through polarization, display and persuasion processes for some political leaders or members of the Iraqi parliament." ".
Abu Ragheef added in his interview with Al-Jazeera Net that he "does not believe that there is a party or a former political alliance that was able to advance the reality of Iraq," noting that "the repetition of the political faces themselves does not work."
He stressed that "the new political coalition will not be able to advance reality, and will not be able to change anything from the situation in the country, but rather to support the current government."
For his part, writer and researcher Shaho Al-Qurra Daghi shows that "the recent developments in Iraq - especially the October demonstrations - revealed the decline and decline in the weight of Shiite parties and currents within the southern societies and governorates that are the main popular incubator of these parties."
The researcher Al Qurra Daghi told Al Jazeera Net that "these events prompted many leaders to review their performance to win back the street as we have seen from the recent playing of the civil tendon after the aversion to the street from religious currents."
And Karra Dagi believes that "the new alliance will not add anything new on the Iraqi scene and the political track, because the points he emphasized are repetitive and well known and are just ink on paper," noting that "the current political parties that have also participated in this new alliance are an essential partner in the process Political and to establish the principle of quotas, which weakened the Iraqi state. "
As for the political analyst, Nazir Al-Kandouri, he says that "this bloc, which consists of 50 deputies and may increase in number after the joining of the victory bloc of former Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi, will have an active and strong role."
He adds in his interview with Al-Jazeera Net that "the issue of the alliance or the new political bloc has nothing to do with the issue of advancing the reality of Iraq and moving it to a better state as it pertains to a struggle for power."
And he points out that "the formation of a new political alliance is a new link in the ongoing political struggle in Iraq, without the hope of changing the situation in Iraq for the better."
Political goals and
regarding the impact of the new coalition on ending the political stalemate in Iraq, Al-Kandouri believes that "it does not aim to move the stalemate that the current political process suffers from, but rather came to respond to the parliamentary moves to be taken by political blocs that stand against Mustafa Al-Kazemi and his actions that he With them finally against the crowd. "
He points out that "some Shiite blocs affected by the influence of armed groups began to form a new political bloc supporting al-Kazemi in the House of Representatives, formed by Ammar al-Hakim with some small blocs, and it is hoped that the Haider al-Abadi parliamentary bloc will soon join them."
The opinion of Al-Qurra Dagi is shared by the opinion that "it is unlikely that the new Al-Hakim alliance will contribute to dismantling crises and ending the political stalemate in Iraq, especially as these crises that Iraq is going through today are accumulations of political mistakes that lasted for more than 17 years." He pointed out that "Al-Hakim was one of the participants in this political process that produced this inevitable reality."
The Iraqi researcher notes that "it is clear that the political mindsets that contributed to creating the current reality will not be able to provide practical and real solutions to get out of crises, as much as they really aim to preserve their existence and gains by using national slogans and marketing themselves to the Iraqi street without Any real changes within these parties and the currents that have become a major part of the current crisis. "
In support of Kazemi
and see some observers and analysts that the alliance of al - Hakim came to support the new government of Mustafa Kazemi.
Political analyst Nazir Al-Kandouri notes in this regard that "a bloc of more than 50 deputies will be the best supporter of Al-Kazemi in his confrontation of parties and armed groups," adding to Al Jazeera Net that it "will be the pillar of Al-Kazemi who is relying on him to pass the laws that he wants from the House of Representatives," according to His expression.
In this context, the researcher Abu Ragheef believes that "an alliance (Iraqis) will be a pragmatic alliance because it will be supportive to one party and not others", pointing out that "he will support Al-Kazemi for the purpose of getting out of the spiral of crises that erupt from one moment to another."
For his part, the strategic expert, Hisham Al-Hashemi, commented on the announcement of the formation of an "Iraqi" alliance, and said that "this alliance may be the founding nucleus of a parliamentary bloc of Sandh Al-Kazemi."
Activist Ghaith Al-Tamimi says that "an (Iraqi) alliance stresses the state’s sovereignty and supports its institutional system," noting that "it aims to protect the government of Al-Kazemi and guarantee the influence of the stream of wisdom without clearly revealing the fate of the reform coalition and the legitimacy of the political system and the largest bloc and other violating constitutional vocabulary."
The journalist Zeinab Rabie believes that if the coalition was formed with the aim of supporting Al-Kazemi, "this is a good opportunity for the role of the opposition to be active by the political parties that suffer the phobia of the peaceful transfer of power."
If the Iraqi Alliance is formed on the goal of its establishment, "Supporting Al-Kazemi", then this is a good opportunity for the role of the opposition # from political parties that suffer the phobia of the peaceful transfer of power, the opposition that represents a line of reform parallel to the line of the government, the goal of the evaluation and not the fall!
Otherwise, you say: We play if we destroy the stadium.
- Zainab Rabi` (@RabeeZainab) June 30, 2020
Controversy in the Iraqi street
The new political alliance sparked controversy in the Iraqi street, and singers doubted the ability of these alliances to change the direction and create a new political path that supports national sovereignty and resolves the country's crises, while some pioneers of networking sites see that the alliance did not bring anything new, as it was born from the womb of the parties The same ruler.
Researcher and author Ali Al-Moayyad says that "the (Iraqis) alliance is an important station for the meeting of the Iraqi forces of moderation in a united front."
"The (Iraqis) coalition is distinguished by a large number of parliamentarians, but it does not stop at the language of numbers, but it is working to present a new model in the conscious and responsible political administration," activist Qasim said.
Political researcher Iyad Al-Amber asked, "Ammar Al-Hakim is the most political figure who proposes initiatives and forms alliances ... As a result, what has been achieved for Iraq from them, and what has the Iraqi citizen benefited from ?!"
Mr. Ammar Al-Hakim is the most political figure who proposes initiatives and forms alliances .. As a result, what has been achieved for Iraq from them? What did the Iraqi citizen benefit from? #Iraq #Iraqis pic.twitter.com/JSFZIUPMNe
Iyad Al-Amber (@ ayadhussein1) June 30, 2020
Activist Abu Ahmed Al-Anzi wrote, "Ammar Al-Hakim: The citizen will win 2010, and the citizen will be first 2014, and I will like her 2018, and Iraqis 2020 ... Since 2003, for now the citizen has not won, nor has he become first, nor have they become like this, nor have they become Iraqis!"
And Major General Mohammed al-Husseini expressed his opinion on the new alliance, and said, "I am very pessimistic about the (Iraqi) alliance, because he will win a lot as an alliance, but the people will lose a lot. It is the establishment of a bad and dangerous next stage."
I am very pessimistic # Thalv_aragiwn
because he will win so much as an alliance
but the people will lose so much
that he incorporation stage coming bad dangerous
will encourage ditching profit for the gains of partisan and personal
and flirts with the government to keep what they earned unlawfully
courting the Americans and ourselves through the government
so the waves are made before the ride
- Major General Mohammed al-Husseini (@eee___IIlIlI_TM) June 30, 2020