• Crisis Anm junta, resign president and secretary. Bonafede: "Institutions need response"
  • Mistrust: "The Senate does not approve", compact majority with Bonafede

Share

May 25, 2020

Today the plenum of the ANM, with the junta that threatens the dissolution after the publication of the latest interceptions of the investigation that swept the former President Palamara.

Bonafede: earthquake on togas, Institutions need response. Reforming the CSM
"The real earthquake that is affecting the Italian judiciary after the so-called 'Palamara case' requires a timely response from the institutions. Neva of the credibility of the judiciary, which our rule of law cannot renounce". Defense Minister Alfonso Bonafede wrote on Facebook, which specifically relaunches the proposed reform of the CSM, stressing that it will bring it to the attention of the majority this week.

"In my speech to the Senate on Wednesday - writes Bonafede - among the projects from which to start again in the field of justice, I referred to the reform of the Superior Council of the Judiciary: now we can no longer wait. This week I will bring to the attention of the majority the reform project, on which, among other things, we had already found excellent convergence shortly before the pandemic broke out ".

At the heart of the project, explains the Guardasigilli, "there are: a new electoral system removed from the degeneration of current accountancy; the identification of mechanisms that ensure that the criteria with which appointments are made are inspired only by merit; the clear separation between politics and judiciary with the blocking of the so-called 'revolving doors' ".

"These are laws - affirmed the minister - that have been talked about for decades: non-postponable innovations on which the institutions must not divide but, on the contrary, must be compacted. Also because they are not 'against' the judiciary rules but to protect the overwhelming majority of magistrates who every day, with passion and professionalism, work to protect the rights of all citizens. They are those magistrates who do not deserve to be dragged into a whirlwind of controversy that aims to make all the grass a bundle ". "As I said in recent weeks (in which I have even been attributed, using instrumental decisions that are of the judiciary), an institutional man must not feed controversy but - he concludes - solve problems with facts".