On Tuesday, the trial of the suspected murder of Wilma, 17, in Uddevalla District Court ended the trial. The hearing has been going on for ten days and a large number of witnesses have been heard.

In his final plea, prosecutor Jim Westerberg said that the boyfriend had gone wrong on several occasions and could not be trusted. Instead, the prosecutor pointed out that the boyfriend was trying to clear traces from the apartment and that he must also have planted traces of rest.

The prosecutor's conclusion was presented after just over an hour: the boyfriend should be sentenced to life in prison for the murder of 17-year-old Wilma.

 - It is the boyfriend who is the perpetrator. It's unreasonable that it could be about someone else, Jim Westerberg said.

According to the prosecutor, the motive must have been that Wilma, 17, made an end with the man for the first time. The relationship must have been violent and witnesses have stated that Wilma was previously subjected to violence in the relationship. At this point, at the end of November, the boyfriend is supposed to be acting strangely and he must have called Wilma among others "satan" and "lucifer".

- There are a lot of circumstances that coincide this week that culminate on the evening of November 14 when Wilma dies.

The prosecutor also pointed to a variety of technical evidence. Among other things, there are blood traces in all of the apartment's rooms, which point to extensive violence. The prosecutor also pointed out that Wilima's mobile phone did not leave the area where the apartment is after November 14. The phone has not been found but the police have been able to find that it was switched off manually on November 15.

- She's been defenseless. There are injuries to the boyfriend's body that show that Wilma was trying to defend himself, and not injuries after a lamp change that he himself said the injuries were coming from, says prosecutor Shahrzad Rahimi.

The expo boyfriend has constantly denied crime. According to him, Wilma left the apartment after a brawl on November 14. Since then, he should not have seen or heard from her. Later on Tuesday, the defendant's defender will have his case.

Javascript is turned off

Javascript must be turned on to play video

Learn more about browser support

The browser is not supported

SVT does not support playback in your browser. We therefore recommend that you switch to another browser.

Learn more about browser support