Right now in Taiwan, various "de-Sinization" political dramas are emerging one after another, seriously disrupting Taiwan's social cognition system and causing serious impact and impact on cross-strait relations. Recently, the leaders of the DPP authorities have reiterated the so-called "Taiwan Republic of China" political symbol, which is intended to continue to promote "gradual Taiwan independence" and may become a prelude to "legitimate constitutional independence" and "legal Taiwan independence", which will inevitably cause serious consequences.

　　Replacing "Republic of China" with "Republic of China Taiwan" is a trick of "seeking independence" that challenges the bottom line

　　"Taiwan of the Republic of China" is the "creation and invention" of some "Taiwan independence" figures in the Democratic Progressive Party. Its essence is to make "Taiwan independence" a backdoor listing, which is very deceptive and confusing. After the founding of the People's Republic of China on October 1, 1949, the Taiwan authorities in the corner of An'an continued to use the names "Republic of China" and "Government of the Republic of China", but at best they were only a local authority on Chinese territory. Of course, before the reunification of the two sides of the strait, the "Republic of China" and the meaning it represents still have practical significance for maintaining the historical and legal connection between the two sides. The "Taiwan Republic of China" theory intends to cut off this connection. The deceptive and deceptive nature lies in that it connects "Taiwan" and "Republic of China" on the surface, and actually cuts off "Republic of China" in terms of time and space. "The connection with the mainland, this" Republic of China "is no longer the" Republic of China "established in 1912 as" Territory and Continent ", its time is limited since 1949, and its space is limited to the Golden Horse of Taiwan. The inauguration speech of the May 20th leader of the Taiwan region has made this very clear. This can not only appease the "Republic of China faction", but also make payments to some "independence factions", which can satisfy Taiwan's internal consumption and has a certain political market.

　　In essence, "Republic of China Taiwan" and "Republic of China" have completely different political attributes. The reference to "Taiwan of the Republic of China" is a political trick to split the country's territorial sovereignty. Some scholars in Taiwan pointed out: "Taiwan is still under the jurisdiction of the Republic of China today, and in accordance with the Constitution of the Republic of China under Tsai Ing-wen's inauguration of allegiance, seeking" Taiwan independence "with practical actions is more than" impairing the dignity of the country "and" harming the country ". Changing the state system, according to its oath, must accept the most severe sanctions. "

　　Taiwanese politicians play tricks on "Taiwan independence's edge" trickery

　　Since 1979, cross-strait relations have gradually shifted from confrontation to dialogue, exchanges, cooperation, and cooperative governance of common affairs. Although there were setbacks during the period, on the whole, the two sides have accumulated common interests, emotions, and political consensus through exchanges and exchanges. Peacefully resolve differences between the two sides of the strait to create conditions. However, some "extreme Taiwan independence" elements within the DPP used the DPP's ruling opportunity in Taiwan to play various tricks in the "Taiwan independence fringe policy" game.

　　Taking the textbook policy as an example, although the curriculum adjustment cannot change the jurisprudence and historical facts of the same country on both sides of the strait, the attempt behind it is to disintegrate the relevant jurisprudential provisions that reflect the same nature of the two sides of the strait. Just as the DPP authorities did not accept the "92 Consensus", the attempt behind it was to hollow out the long-standing Taiwanese people's recognition that the two sides of the strait belong to the same country. The DPP authorities have used political deception to seek political self-interest, carrying out extreme damage to the same country on both sides of the strait, and using the method of "cutting sausages" to approach the edge of "Taiwan independence" indefinitely. It is difficult for ordinary Taiwanese people to see through this kind of political fraud that challenges the one-China principle and takes the political tightrope. However, this kind of political adventure that is approaching "legal Taiwan independence" indefinitely will eventually fail. In the future, if the DPP politicians continue to have an understanding of the "Taiwan Independence Policy", it will be inevitable to touch the bottom line of the Anti-Secession Law.

　　DPP authorities' "Taiwan independence marginal policy" will eventually set fire to self-immolation

　　The DPP authorities attempted to get rid of the political and legal constraints of one China through the replacement of "political symbols" and will inevitably challenge the current legal and political order in Taiwan. Similarly, when "Republic of China Taiwan" replaces "Republic of China", the nature of cross-strait political relations will undergo major changes, endangering national sovereignty and territorial integrity, and the mainland will have to take all necessary measures to maintain the legal and political status of the same country on both sides of the strait. . Not only that, the DPP authorities' challenge to the bottom line of "Taiwan independence" will seriously affect the peace and stability of the Taiwan Straits and impact regional order.

　　"There are always people who better than you". The political deception of the DPP ’s “Taiwan Independence Policy” has sometimes been punctured. The DPP cannot afford to move toward "independence," and the international community cannot accept Taiwan's move toward "independence." The DPP authorities' engaging in such political dramas will only cause the two sides of the strait to slide towards zero and confrontation. In fact, with the rapid growth of the mainland's overall strength, "there are already the conditions and capabilities to solve the Taiwan issue in terms of physics." Even if some people lose their rationality and break through the bottom line, there are quite a few countermeasure policy tools on the mainland. Once there are major changes in cross-strait relations, in addition to the solution of force, political, economic, legal, social, and diplomatic means can be used to govern the Taiwan region. "The Taiwan issue arises because of national weakness and will end with national revival!" If the DPP authorities lose their rationality and cross the legal and political bottom line, the result can only be to accelerate the process of complete reunification between the two sides of the strait. It is hoped that the DPP authorities will get back in the dark and return to the right path as soon as possible.

　　(The author is the director of the Collaborative Innovation Center for Peaceful Development of Cross-Strait Relations and a professor at the Taiwan Research Institute of Xiamen University)