According to this study, published by Le Monde but which must still receive the validation of certain experts, the ballot of March 15 would not have participated in the spread of the virus, in view of the circulation of the epidemic on the territory and the rate participation at the departmental level.

The level of participation in the first round of municipal elections on March 15 would have "not contributed statistically" to the spread of the Covid-19, according to a study by statisticians and epidemiologists published Friday by Le Monde . The authors of this analysis compared the figures for participation in the first round at the departmental level and the progression of the coronavirus at the local level.

"We did not find a statistical effect of the level of participation in each department on subsequent hospitalizations for Covid-19, measured locally," says Jean-David Zeitoun of the Center for Clinical Epidemiology at Hôtel-Dieu in Paris. , study coordinator, on the daily website. "In other words, it is not because people went to vote more in a given department that the disease has spread more quickly in terms of hospitalizations," he said.

>> LIVE - Coronavirus: follow the evolution of the situation

Very strong abstention

The national scientific committee must give an opinion next week to the government on the possibility or not of organizing the second ballot at the end of June. Several assessors and elected officials, often very involved in the electoral campaign, had been victims of the virus after the first round, which had fueled the controversy over the maintenance of voting in the midst of an epidemic.

The ballot of March 15 also resulted in a surge of 18 points in abstention compared to municipal 2014. However, "the differential in abstention, compared to 2014, could be of the same order in municipalities of Grand-Est, very affected, only in western regions where the disease was still very rare ", underlines Jérôme Fourquet, director of the Opinion department of the FIFG and co-author of this work.

CORONAVIRUS ESSENTIALS

> Coronavirus: the French Academy has decided, it will now be necessary to say “the” Covid-19

> Coronavirus: is the second wave inevitable?

> Gatherings, trips, sport: what remains prohibited despite the deconfinement

> Deconfinement: what you need to know about returning to work 

> Deconfinement: what hygiene for self-service bikes, scooters and scooters?

Define the framework for the second round

The study put online on the basis of MedRxiv prepublication "has not yet undergone peer review prior to any publication by a scientific journal," says Le Monde . Asked about this work, the government spokeswoman, Sibeth Ndiaye, recalled that the government will rely on the advice of the scientific council to decide on the holding of the second round. "We are also committed to the fact that there is a national consensus around this issue so that, basically, the situation we experienced in the first round was not repeated, where many agreed before and discovered themselves against after, "she said on France 2 on Friday.

© Agence France-Presse