China News Service, May 6th, the person in charge of the Supreme Inspection and Supervision Bureau announced on the 6th that prosecutors violated the "three regulations" in 6 typical cases.
Data map: Supreme People's Procuratorate. China News Agency reporter Li Huisi
The Supreme People's Procuratorate today held a press conference on "emphasizing the implementation of the 'three regulations' and building a 'firewall' for a clean and judicial system". Wang Songmiao, a spokesman for the Supreme People ’s Procuratorate, said that the State Council Office of the People ’s Republic of China issued and implemented the Regulations on Records, Notifications and Accountability of Leading Cadres Interfering in Judicial Activities and Handling Specific Cases in 2015, and the Central Political and Law Commission issued and implemented Regulations on Recording and Investigation of Liability in Cases of Inquiry, and the “Two Departments and Three Departments” jointly issued and implemented “Several Regulations on Further Regulating the Contacts and Interactions between Judicial Officers, Litigants, Lawyers, Special Relations, and Intermediary Organizations.” These three normative documents are today's well-known "three regulations", and they have also become a "tight spell" that restricts judicial personnel from all walks of life.
In response to 6 typical cases, the person in charge of the Supreme Inspection and Supervision Bureau said that in these 6 cases, there were both leading cadres intervening in the intervention of the prosecution case, and cases where the prosecutor questioned the judicial handling of the case and improper contact with the lawyer; both because of the violation. The "Three Regulations" are negative cases subject to party discipline, political discipline, and even criminal responsibility, and there are also positive cases where records are required to be exempted from accountability. details as follows:
Case 1: Zhao Moumou violated the "three regulations" case. This is a case in which leading cadres intervened to intervene in the prosecution case. Zhao Moumou is the chief prosecutor of a county-level city people ’s procuratorate. When confronted by a city-level leading cadre in the city, Cui Mou intervened in a criminal case handled by the court, he not only refused and recorded the report according to the regulations, but also Cui's intervention did not perform his duties in accordance with the law, which led to the defendant's felony condemnation. Affected by Cui Mou ’s interference case, Liu Moumou, the chief prosecutor of the case-handling team undertaking the case, and Han Moumou, the undertaking prosecutor, also failed to properly perform their procuratorial duties, resulting in the procuratorial organs failing to supervise the case in a timely manner.
This case shows that the "three regulations" are not only a powerful measure to prevent leading cadres from interfering in judicial activities and intervening in specific treatment, but also a fundamental measure to prevent prosecutors from violating discipline and law, promoting fair and clean justice, and improving judicial credibility.
Case 2: Chen violated the "three regulations" case. This is a positive case where the prosecutor recorded and reported relevant major issues in accordance with the requirements. Chen once served as the political commissar of the police detachment of a city's people's procuratorate. He accepted the request of the parties or relatives and friends of the case and repeatedly questioned or interfered with the cases handled by the lower-level procuratorate. Wang, Hao, Chen, Liu The four post prosecutors rejected Chen's behavior and made supplemental reports when they filled in the reports. Not only were they not held accountable, but they were also praised by the higher courts. The behavior of Chen Mou and Wang Mou and other four post prosecutors is in stark contrast, and it is worth every prosecutor's thought and reference.
Case 3: Jin Mou and others violated the "three regulations" case. This is a case where a prosecutor has violated the rules and asked the procurator to handle the case. Jin once served as a deputy minister of the Procuratorial Management Department of a prefecture-level people's procuratorate, accepted the request of others, and used the convenience of his duties to investigate the case of "black" personnel and sought to escape criminal responsibility. Chen Mou, the deputy inspector general of the hospital, had no record of the circumstances in which Jin Mou asked him about the case. Jin's failure to strictly implement the "three regulations" not only led him to the abyss of illegality and crime, but also "engaged" his colleague Chen Mou by being notified and criticized.
This case shows that the strict implementation of the "three regulations" is for the prosecutors to wear a "armor" that is anti-corrosion and anti-hunting. If you lose this "armor", you will inevitably be "harmed", even if the other party is "self". in this way.
Case 4: Wang violated the "three regulations" case. This is a case in which the leading cadres of the procuratorial organ intervened in the judicial process. Wang had served as the director of the political department and deputy attorney general of the People ’s Procuratorate of a municipality, and she deserved to follow the Party Discipline and State Law, but she regarded the power granted by the party and the people as a tool for personal gain, ignoring the "three regulations." "Requested to accept others' requests, accept bribes from others, use their influence to help others reduce or evade punishment, intervene and intervene in prosecution authorities to handle cases in accordance with the law, and eventually degenerate from a respected party member leading cadre to be rejected by others Corrupt elements. This case shows that if the "three regulations" are not strictly enforced, prosecutors are likely to go astray, go further and further on the path of violation of discipline, and even fall into the abyss of criminal crime.
Case 5: Wu violated the "three regulations" case. This is a case of an improper contact between a prosecutor and a party or person with special relationships. Wu was the chief of the investigation and supervision section of a county people's procuratorate. Due to the affection of his classmates and friends, he lost his position and principles. People are exempt from criminal prosecution's "Procuratorial Proposal", and voluntarily give up the responsibility of filing supervision, so that criminal suspects evade the sanctions of the law. This case shows that strictly implementing the "three regulations" is an important measure to prevent prosecutors from being "hunted" and to effectively guarantee judicial justice.
Case 6: Liu and others violated the "three regulations" case. This is a case in which a leading cadre of a procuratorial organ started to violate the "three regulations", and finally led to multiple leading cadres of a procuratorial and judicial organ in violation of discipline and law and even a criminal case. Liu once served as the deputy procurator-general of the People's Procuratorate of a city, accepted the request of others, and used his influence to interfere with the lower-level procuratorate in handling a criminal case in violation of the regulations. Tian Mou, then deputy chief of the People ’s Procuratorate of the city and Gao Moumou, the chief of the Public Prosecution Section of the court, intervened to intervene and handled the case illegally. After the case was prosecuted to the court, Liu again found the relevant personnel of the court and asked for intercession for the criminal suspect, resulting in a suspended sentence for Zhang Moumou, who should have been sentenced to more than ten years in prison. This case once again highlights the great value and significance of strictly implementing the "three regulations" for the maintenance of judicial justice.