The Ras Al Khaimah Criminal Court ruled, yesterday, that five persons of Arab nationalities were acquitted of the charge of impersonating the investigation personnel and detaining and stealing Asians, to contradict the victims ’statements and the unreasonability of the incident.
According to the prosecution’s indictment, all the defendants detained two young men of Asian nationality, deprived them of their liberty without legal means, and impersonated the men of investigations and used force with them, being more than two people, as they entered their residence and detained them in one of the rooms after restricting them, and the purpose was for that Make a profit by seizing the money of the first victim, his phone, and the phone of the second victim.
She added that the defendants stole 826 dirhams and the victim's phone, through coercion and false pretense, that they were interrogators, and they tied and held them inside one of the apartment rooms with the intention of fleeing the stolen goods.
She pointed out that the defendants assumed a public position by inviting the victims to be investigative men, and entered a haunted place other than the will of its owner, and accused the third and fourth defendants of drinking alcohol, as they are rational, adult Muslims who know their freedom according to the provisions of Islamic Sharia.
In the case papers, it was stated that the first victim was walking on one of the roads with one of his friends, where three people who were traveling in a vehicle stopped him, and informed him that they were investigations, and they asked them to see their identities so the first victim took out his money and one of the accused withdrew it and then took him to a residence inside Some people of African nationality entered all of them into a room, documented their hands and left the place after the door was closed on them.
She pointed out that the victims managed to break their bonds, and the first victim went out, and found a coin wallet at one of the tables, and it was found that 826 dirhams were stolen from them, and he reported the incident, and later made a waiver against all the accused, and the Public Prosecution stated that the waiver of the incident does not It changes the description of the crime and its veracity, as long as the true picture of the incident is extracted.
The lawyer for the defense of four defendants in the case called for Hanan Al-Bayed to acquit her clients based on fabricating the accusation and fabricating the incident by the first victim, and opposing his statements in the investigations, in addition to opposing the statements of the first and second victims in the investigations.
She added that she pays the invalidity of the records of inference, and adheres to the unreasonable occurrence of the absence of a witness in the case confirming its validity, in addition to invalidating the arrest procedures of the defendants due to the lack of permission from the Public Prosecution, and pointed out that the first victim reported that he was taken by the defendants from the highway , While the second victim reported that he was in the residence, and that one of them knocked on the door, and when it opened, it became clear to him that there were five people who entered the house and stole his phone and held him with the rest of the people in the house.
She added that the difference in the two versions confirms the falsehood of the victims and their falsehood to the incident.