Yesterday, the Criminal Court of Appeals in Ras Al-Khaimah ruled unanimously to execute an Asian father who was accused of signing the daughter of a minor (14 years old) and violated her offer.
According to the prosecution’s indictment, the accused accused of indecent assault and rape of his daughter, incited her to watch pornographic films, sexually exploit her, and threatened her with a felony against her, and urged her to improve sin, and the Court of First Instance ruled, last month, by consensus, that the accused be executed according to the accusations against him , Where the accused denied before the court the charges against him.
In the case papers, it was stated that the victim had been sexually assaulted by her father, since she was seven years old until she was 14 years old, when he was sexually abusing her to watch and display pornographic films on her, while her mother traveled to her country and left her at home with him.
The case papers added that the victim was unable to reveal the incident of her assault on her mother, over the past years, for fear of threatening her father with a felony against her, and stated in the investigations that she decided to resist the assault and escape from the house at night, after her father re-assaulted her, and she went to the home of one of the Her friends, and informed her of the details of the attack.
The case papers indicated that her friend's family went with her to the police station to open a report in the incident, where the victim's statements were heard, the accused was summoned, and he was referred to the Public Prosecution and then to the criminal court for trial on the charges against him.
The defense lawyer for the accused had demanded, before the Court of Appeal, to cancel the ruling issued by the Court of First Instance, based on corruption in reasoning, and for the medical committee to violate the technical and professional deficiencies due in such cases.
He explained that the medical committee should have complied with the referral decision issued by the court to examine the accused and keep him 15 days in the hospital to examine his mental capabilities, pointing out that preparing the medical report required that the accused be presented more than twice to the medical committee to hear his statements.
He pointed out that the Public Prosecution and the court fully listened to the statements of the accused in the incident, but the medical committee was satisfied with two interviews, and the preparation of a technical report based on the statements of his wife, who decided that he was responsible for his actions.