A bus supervisor rejects the decision to end its services

The Federal Supreme Court overturned an appeal ruling to annul the decision to end the bus service supervisor, and compensate it with 15,000 dirhams, deciding to refer the case to the Court of Appeal for further consideration, in light of the fact that the prosecutor filed her lawsuit outside the legal deadline.

In details, the superintendent of a school bus filed a lawsuit, demanding that the decision to terminate her service and judging her with all her entitlements, handing over her passport and transferring her sponsorship, and ruling her for compensation for the damages incurred to her.

In her lawsuit, she said, "She worked for the defendant with a job supervising students, and transported them by bus until she finished her service."

The court of first instance ruled after the appointment of an expert to cancel the decision to terminate the service of the plaintiff, and compensate it for the illegality of the decision in the amount of 15,000 dirhams and pay all her salaries, and enable her to have her passport and identity card, then the Appeals Court endorsed it, and the employer did not accept this ruling, and she appealed to him before the Federal Court Supreme.

The employer considered that the appeal ruling violated the law and erred in its application, as it ruled that its decision to terminate the service of the plaintiff was unlawful, if the latter learned of the decision in January 2018 and did not file a lawsuit until August 2018, which made the case unacceptable.

The Federal Supreme Court upheld the appeal, noting that the decision in the rules regulated by Article (84) bis of the Civil Procedure Law, that the time for filing a cancellation case is 60 days from the date the person concerned announced or knew about it with certain knowledge by any means of news, including It actually achieves the purpose of the announcement, which is a condition of the system that is necessary to accept the cancellation lawsuit, which the court raises on its own, and opponents can raise it at any stage of the case.

She pointed out that the preliminary ruling in support of the appeal judgment jumped from examining the date of challenging the decision in the dispute, and ended in its illegality, and he ruled to the plaintiff in the amount of 15 thousand dirhams, and then the ruling violated the law by not examining the date of the deadline for filing the cancellation lawsuit, which defects him with what must be reversed. To be with the referral veto.