The DPP authorities have recently vilified, blamed, and provoked the mainland to become addicted. Officials from the Taiwan Affairs Commission have also made remarks, saying that due to the epidemic prevention and control, the mainland "strengthens stability and infringes on the people's right to express opinions" and demands that the mainland "respect and protect human rights." From the standpoint of the DPP, everything on the mainland can be wrong. The epidemic prevention efforts are "human rights violations", and the lack of epidemic prevention efforts is "poor governance." This "black-and-white talk" is not worth a moment. We need to point out that the DPP authorities should look in the mirror before speaking to see what qualifications they have to talk about "free human rights."
At present, the right to a healthy life of the people is the largest and most urgently needed human right. The mainland's efforts to prevent and control the epidemic are obvious to all. It is the mainland's resolute and proper measures to prevent and control the epidemic that has effectively protected human rights in China and the world. The DPP authorities used the mainland ’s epidemic prevention work to approve the mainland ’s “no human rights”. It is simply using the inertia of thinking that everything is politicized. In the eyes of the DPP, can it be called "have human rights" if the epidemic spreads?
Let ’s look at what the DPP has done to “respect human rights” in the face of the epidemic. Increasing flights from the mainland sent back more than 1,000 Taiwan compatriots stranded in Hubei, and the DPP refused to accept them! The latest order issued by the DPP authorities is to make the list of more than 1,000 shipments into a no-entry list, requiring relevant departments and airlines not to allow these stranded Taiwanese compatriots to fly back to Taiwan by themselves. The DPP authorities are asked to answer the question: What are the human rights of these Taiwan compatriots?
After China Eastern Airlines has successfully transported a group of Taiwanese compatriots back to Taiwan, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has rushed into proposing that it must be chartered by Taiwan Airlines, and the maximum number of Taiwanese compatriots is 200. In order to protect the rights of Taiwan compatriots, the mainland again proposed that cross-strait airlines cooperate to carry Taiwan compatriots back to their hometowns, but the DPP turned a blind eye to the steps and goodwill handed over to them, and still flatly refused. The DPP authorities are stone-hearted and refuse to enter the oil and salt, and they have completely blocked the way home for Taiwanese compatriots in Hubei. Only the DPP authorities can do such a thing that harms the human rights of Taiwan compatriots.
Who would imagine that when traveling, visiting relatives, or working in an epidemic situation, they would be told by their politicians in their homes that they "would not be allowed to go home"; the people of Taiwan would risk "being strayed" or "exiled" when they went to the mainland. Is this really what happened in a society of "democratic freedom and human rights"? Looking at the world, all countries and regions are trying their best to pick up people and go home. They are the only members of the DPP who have performed such brutal acts against their families. "Taiwan's No. 1" is certainly true, and it is the only model that can be described as the "most human rights".
The MAC also criticized the mainland for "free speech." "Freedom of speech" is probably the DPP's favorite word. Whenever they speak out, make rumors, turn right and wrong, and discredit attacks, they must carry this banner. Let ’s take a look at what the DPP authorities used the so-called “prevention priority” as an expression of what “freedom of speech” looks like: When Taiwanese businessmen were asked to return to the mainland to “eat bats”, when Taiwanese compatriots were called “China When people come to eat our health insurance, "when the DPP's" net army "overwhelmed Taiwan's lovers of the mainland and turned them into" Taiyi "and" inner ghosts ", when people of insight on the island advanced to the DPP Party authorities ’anti-epidemic measures, discriminatory policies, and cold-blooded words and deeds were besieged by politicians,“ famous mouthpieces, ”and“ cybers. ”When they were besieged by bullies, they expanded. When Taiwanese youths went to the mainland to find employment, they were fined by the DPP authorities. When all the people on the island who participated in cross-strait exchanges had the sword of Damocles of the "reverse osmosis law" hanging over them ... did those who were surrounded by "green terror" have "free speech"?
With the DPP authorities, "free speech" is the freedom to support "Taiwan independence". It is the freedom of green political forces to freely rumor and arbitrarily abuse and humiliate ordinary people. It is the freedom to provoke cross-strait hatred and vilify the mainland. This kind of "freedom of speech" that transcends the borders of civilization and only causes social tears and pain for the people is, to put it plainly, the DPP's "green hegemony" violently ravages the island.
The DPP authorities are really not qualified to pretend to be a ghost on the island under the guise of "democracy, freedom and human rights". Wash your dirty hands and mouth first! Otherwise it is really embarrassing.
Wang Ping