The Ras Al Khaimah Criminal Court ruled the acquittal of an Arab accused of indecent assault of a girl who was coerced while going with him to learn about the nature of the work entrusted to her, and the court confirmed in the merits of the ruling that she did not find enough in the case papers to prove the accusation against the accused, as the incident did not witness any Witness, and what is stated in the victim’s testimony is not taken, and the court does not see it sufficient to convict the accused, because the victim’s statements were conflicting about the timing of the incident.
She added that the victim had decided at the beginning of the investigations that she had met the accused at half past five in the evening on the day of the incident, and had returned to her home at six and forty minutes, and then returned and decided upon confronting the defendant's statements and the investigations that were based on them that they were present at one of the petrol stations at eight thirty in the evening She did not realize the timing on the day of the accident.
She stated that he does not change the face of the opinion of the case what the course of investigations testified, that his investigations concluded the validity of the incident, as this does not exceed his opinion, which is likely to be true and false, which varies with certainty, and that it is legally and legally determined that the provisions of the conviction are not based on Suspicion, guesswork, and probability, but on assertion and certainty, and if suspicion addresses the evidence, the verdict must be acquitted, which prompted the court to acquit the accused acquitted of what was assigned to him.
In the case papers, it was stated that the victim had contacted the accused with the intention of working for him, so he met her, and they met in one of the areas of Ras Al Khaimah, and he took it down with his car and told her that he would take her to a construction site to see him, where he was dumped in a dark deserted place, grabbed her hand and sensed parts of her body without her consent, then Stuck to it,
I pushed him and burst into tears, so the accused defused her, asked her to conceal the incident, and sent her to her home, where the victim submitted a report to the police station, so the accused who denied the victim's statements was seized, and he was referred to the criminal court, and the accused denied during the trial the charges assigned to him, and a lawyer demanded Defense of the accused, Ramzi the old man, of the innocence of his client.