Multiple witnesses say `` information lacks concreteness '' grounds for killing Iran commander
A leading U.S. newspaper, The New York Times, reported on the Trump administration's discussions leading to the killing of Iranian commander Soleimani, and while governments determined there was an `` imminent threat, '' several officials said He said he had testified that he was lacking in concreteness.
According to the New York Times dated 11, Commander Soleimani's "imminent threat" was gathered and analyzed by the United States CIA (Central Intelligence Agency), although there was no definitive information, but Lebanon and It was an indication that they were attempting to attack Iraq and other armed organizations and U.S. embassies and bases.
CIA Secretary Hasper said there was little objection among senior Trump administration officials that he was convinced that there was evidence of an attack plan and that it was more dangerous to wait without killing his commander.
But officials testified that there was no concrete information to say `` imminent threat, '' and Pentagon officials were surprised that the president chose the most extreme option of killing. about it.
Also, after the crisis passed, Congress asked the administration to explain the details of the "imminent threat", while the administration rejected it as "secret."
Meanwhile, President Trump said in a FOX News interview that four U.S. embassies were aimed at, with the focus on the decision to kill the commander focused.