If you want to end wars, let the women rule the world. This is the summary of columnist Kathleen Parker in the Washington Post.

At the beginning of her article, Parker asked: When will humans recognize that the male dominance paradigm has exhausted its cycle and reached its end? And when will we start thinking apart from the "eye for an eye" principle?

And she answers that the change will happen when one is in conflict with oneself rather than in conflict with others, and his animal nature is restrained.

Former US President Barack Obama believes that taking more women in leadership positions will reduce wars (Al Jazeera)

To further her point of view, she did not find Kathleen Parker apparently citing a statement by former US President Barack Obama last month when he said that women can solve many of the world's problems that cause men most.

"If more women assume leadership positions, wars will decrease, children will get better care, and we will see a general improvement in the standard of living and income," Obama said.

Parker commented on this by saying that Obama's speech was not taken seriously, although it raised "a serious issue worth studying."

Although Obama has always been waiting for the events to happen, which has caused a number of hawks and critics to curse him, Parker sees his comprehensive approach to problem solving as "inspiring."

Women are more inclined towards patience and care, and the use of accumulated popular wisdom (Getty Images)

In her article, the American journalist goes on to consider that waiting or anticipation is often a virtue, but it is not practiced most of the time, noting that those you call America's "enemies" are very good at waiting these days.

"As for us Americans," Parker adds, "we are not good at waiting for the right moment. We consider waiting in itself an affront to our social status."

"I assert that women are more naturally inclined towards patience and care, and to use the accumulated wisdom of people through witnessing and listening."

And because the tendency to defend the land, or the so-called principle of territoriality, is essentially a male trait - as the writer put it - the wars will seem to be a constant fate of humans all the time.

At the conclusion of her article, Kathleen Parker concluded by stressing that women can rule the world.