Mohammed Ghaith bin Maha Mahazroui, a resident of Abu Dhabi, refused to hold his daughter's wedding party in the hall of a luxury hotel, which costs 400,000 dirhams for four hours, and he asked his daughter's groom to return the loan she gets to the bank, pay 10 dirhams of dowry, and establish The wedding ceremony is in the bride's house rather than being tied to bank loans throughout his marriage years.
In detail, Al Mazrouei told «Emirates Today» that he will be very happy because his daughter will marry tonight without a loan or financial obligations on her husband. And he continued that he refused that his daughter's husband owe the banks, because the loans do not enter into joy between the spouses.
He explained, "I was sitting with my daughter's groom two days ago in a friendly session, and I asked him boldly: Did I take a loan from the bank to reserve the wedding hall in the hotel?" He continued, "His answer was shocking, as I knew that he was getting a loan of approximately 500,000 dirhams from a bank, to pay the wedding hall rent and the rest of the marriage costs."
He added: «I asked him to return the money to the bank immediately, and to hold the wedding ceremony in the bride’s house following the history of the parents and grandparents, and I told him: God bless you, the house is large, and he will bear all the parties without problem, and I will support you in all that is missing. We also agreed that the dowry should be 10 dirhams in the marriage contract, and that he pay the costs he can afford without incurring any overstated sums of money. ”
He pointed out that he suffered a lot when he learned that the bridegroom borrowed from the bank to complete the wedding, adding that banks and hotels are now fixing the date of marriage, not the newlyweds.
He explained that the hotel is crowded, and the groom must pay between 200 thousand and 400 thousand dirhams to reserve the wedding hall, and his role is waiting after two or three months to obtain an appointment, and the groom must wait for the bank’s approval to obtain the loan to proceed with the wedding ceremony procedures.
He added that he refused that banks and hotels interfere in the joy of his daughter and her groom, or be a reason for delaying the wedding as a result of the arbitrary measures that they impose, pointing out that he agreed with the newlyweds that the wedding date should be on the day that they had previously chosen, and that he be in the home in which she was raised. Bride, to feel warm among her family.
He explained that he saved a large amount of money from the groom that might make him tied to banks for many years, and that he would be under great pressure as a result of his commitment to pay monthly sums to the bank, noting that he had not taken the decision to hold the wedding ceremony at home alone, but that his daughter the bride participated in the decision, where she agreed to do so And I informed him that he believed in his ideas, and that the wedding ceremony at home would be more joyful than his stay in a wedding hall with money borrowed from banks.
He stated that the bank loan will make the couple happy for two or three days, and their lives will cover them for years, and he will not draw a smile on their faces, adding that the husband is ultimately a young man in his prime, and he may have got a new job, and he wants to complete half of his life without any financial problems.
He explained that he firmly believed that bank loans would destroy the family, and would be an unjust restriction on a young man looking to build his future, so I refused that my daughter's groom be trapped in his loan throughout his marriage.
He added that life in front of them is long, and that the gifts that will be purchased for the bride from jewelry and clothes during their travel travels will rejoice more than the money of the borrowed banks.