The citizen, Mohammed Ghaith bin Maha Al Mazroui, a resident of the Emirate of Abu Dhabi, refused to hold his daughter's wedding party in the hall of a luxury hotel, whose cost amounts to 400 thousand dirhams for four hours, and he asked his daughter’s groom to return the loan that she gets to the bank, and pay 10 dirhams of dowry, And holding the wedding ceremony in the bride's house instead of being bound by bank loans throughout the years of his marriage.
Al Mazrouei told «Emirates Today» that he would be very happy, because his daughter will marry without a loan or financial obligations on her husband, and he continued that he refused that his daughter’s husband be a debtor to the banks, because the loans do not enter into joy between the spouses.
He explained: «I was sitting with my daughter’s groom two days ago in a friendly session, and I asked him boldly if I took a loan from the bank to reserve the wedding hall in the hotel, and his answer was shocking to me, as I knew that he was getting a loan of approximately 500 thousand dirhams from a bank to pay the rent of the wedding hall, And the rest of the marriage costs. ”
He added: “I asked him to return the amount to the bank immediately, and to hold the wedding ceremony in my home, following the example of the parents and grandparents. In a marriage contract, and to pay the costs he is able to afford without incurring any overstated sums of money. ”
He pointed out that he suffered a lot when he learned that the bridegroom borrowed from the bank to complete the wedding, adding that banks and hotels are now fixing the date of marriage, not the newlyweds.
He explained that the hotel is crowded, and the groom must pay between 200 and 400 thousand dirhams to book the wedding hall, and his role is waiting two or three months to obtain an appointment, and the groom must wait for the bank’s approval to obtain the loan to proceed with the wedding ceremony procedures.
He added that he refused banks and hotels to interfere with the joy of his daughter and her groom, or be a reason for delaying the wedding ceremony, pointing out that he agreed with the newlyweds that the wedding date should be on the day they had previously chosen, and that he be in the house where the bride was raised, to feel the warmth Among her family.
He explained that he saved large amounts of money on the groom that might make him tied to banks for many years, and that he would be under great pressure, as a result of his commitment to pay monthly sums to the bank, noting that he had not taken the decision to hold the wedding ceremony at home alone, but that his daughter the bride participated in the decision, where she agreed On that, I informed him that he believed in his ideas, and that the wedding ceremony at home would be more joyful than his stay in a wedding hall with money borrowed from banks.
He stated that the bank loan will make the couple happy for two or three days, and their lives will be spent on them for years, adding that the husband is ultimately a young man in his prime, and he may have got a new job, and he wants to complete half of his life without any financial problems.
He explained that he believed that bank loans would destroy the family, so I refused that my daughter's groom be trapped in his loan throughout his marriage.