The Center Party and the Liberals gave up a lot when they chose to bury the Alliance and support a Social Democrat-led government.
They can't stop the Left Party's disbelief - but they can put it hard against hard.
The Center Party and the Liberals must now demand such liberalizations in compensation that V will never again want to direct distrust because of individual issues.
The fact that the Left Party is threatening to distrust Labor Minister Eva Nordmark is the January shock to date.
The opposition is unified and can set aside a government minister to mark against the reform of the Employment Service.
In essence, it is misguided . Eva Nordmark is not responsible for government formation, has not negotiated the January agreement and is only to implement the government's policy.
More sincerely would have been to direct the distrust of Stefan Löfven. However, a distrust of Löfven had dropped the government, and the Left Party did not want it.
On the other hand, they want to highlight that they are not a doormat for right-wing politics by making Nordmark a scapegoat.
Both the reform of the Employment Service and the writing that "the Left Party will not have influence over the political direction in Sweden" are important issues for the Center Party and the Liberals.
Both gains are likely to fall and the government's policy is shifting to the left.
The Center Party and the Liberals must therefore work hard against hard. Jonas Sjöstedt should not veto individual reforms.
The liberalizations contained in the January agreement should not depend on the Left's goodwill. A united opposition can stop parts of politics.
This is a direct consequence of the distribution of seats in Parliament. If the parties still want to keep the agreement together, they must be ready to compensate for such stops.
1. If the reform of the Employment Service is reworked in a way that the Left Party demands - in contravention of the January agreement - the free year and the family week should also be deleted.
It would not solve the Employment Service's huge problems, but at least remove two of the more damaging labor market reforms in the agreement.
2. If the Left Party gains influence over the policy - contrary to the January agreement - the whole will be difficult to swallow for C and L. To offset this, the promised tax reform should mean a reduced tax burden overall.
This is important for a better functioning labor market and not least marks the Left Party's distance from real influence.
The Left Party cannot be allowed to control the government's policies. Liberal reforms must not fall away without compensation.
The price for the Left Party's distrust must be less leftist politics. Then the Left Party is cut off from influence for real - as long as they prefer Löfven before Kristersson as prime minister.