The Abu Dhabi Court of Cassation rejected an appeal against a defendant who assaulted a policeman in the course of his duty, and committed eight other crimes, including drug abuse, driving a vehicle without license plates in the opposite direction, and driving under the influence of drugs, and upheld the Court of Appeal's ruling to imprisonment and a fine.
The Public Prosecution charged the defendant (a young Gulf), on charges of assaulting a public official, that pushed him during the performance of his job, causing injuries, abuse of psychotropic substance (methamphetamine), damage to a police vehicle, driving under the influence of a psychoactive, driving a vehicle reversing direction, driving It would endanger road users, drive a vehicle without number plates, disobey orders from a public official, and not comply with traffic rules and ethics.
The First Instance Court sentenced the defendant to three years 'imprisonment, a psychotropic offense of 10,000 dirhams, deliberately damaging the vehicle by six months' imprisonment, crimes endangering the lives of road users, driving in the opposite direction, and non-compliance with traffic rules. A three-month prison sentence, a crime of driving a vehicle under the influence of a psychotropic agent, a three-month imprisonment and a fine of 1000 dirhams, and driving a vehicle without a license plate with a fine of 500 dirhams, and ordered the suspension of his driver's license for a year, and depriving him of its extraction after the expiry of its validity.
The defendant appealed the verdict, and the Court of Appeal ruled that the appeal was accepted in the form.In this matter, the appellant was amended and the appellant was imprisoned for six months on charges of assaulting a public official and fining 20,000 dirhams for driving under the influence of psychotropic substances, suspending his driving license for six months, and supporting him otherwise.
The judiciary did not receive acceptance from the convicted person. He appealed against it before the Court of Cassation.
The Court of Cassation confirmed in its ruling that the case papers showed the receipt of a communication that a group of persons are committing traffic violations, and the transfer of security patrols to the scene was seen the vehicle of the appellant coming towards them against the direction of traffic, and does not carry a number plate, in a way that poses a threat to the road users, and when they try to stop it He refused to obey the orders and fled, chasing him by the security patrols, he rammed the patrol, damaged it and continued to flee.He continued to pursue him.He was ambushed with the help of a group of security patrols, blocking the road in front of him, and the vehicle was stopped, and when he tried to arrest and restrict him by the police officer, he attacked Les and pushed him to the ground, resulting in injuries, and found that the commander of the vehicle in the case of abnormal.
The court pointed out that the case papers and investigations showed that a sample of his urine was taken, and examined to show that it contains the psychotropic substance (methamphetamine), a statement verified by the elements of the crimes for which the appellant was convicted, based on technical and anecdotal evidence, and taking into account what witnesses testified, The report of the forensic evidence concerning the examination of the accused's urine sample, the report of the examination of the victim and the report of the seizure report, all of which are well-founded reasons for carrying the judgment. The appeal shall be groundless and shall be rejected. The court shall reject the appeal.
- Security patrols closed the road to the accused and the vehicle was stopped.