The Federal Supreme Court rejected an appeal by the Public Prosecution against an appeal ruling that acquitted two Nokhatha people of the charge of bringing infiltrators into the state by sea boat, confirming the lack of evidence to prove the criminal intent of the accused.
In detail, the Public Prosecution referred two persons to trial, who, as commanders (two boats), brought foreigners into the State in violation of the provisions of the law, demanding that they be punished in accordance with the articles of the Federal Law on the entry and residence of aliens. The Court of Appeal ruled that they were acquitted of the charges against them.
The Public Prosecution said that the verdict acquitted the defendants of the accusation against them on the deed of clearing the papers, which interrupts the will of the defendants to bring the people who were with them in the boat, ignoring the evidence and evidence and explicit confessions in the prosecution's investigation that if they were taken to the boats, seized after they got out of the water Regional state accompanied by hackers. The prosecution added that the court did not examine the sequence of the incident, nor refuted its evidence and circumstances, which flawed the verdict and requires revocation.
The Federal Supreme Court rejected the prosecution's appeal, stating that it is sufficient in criminal trials that the trial court doubts the validity of the indictment against the accused in order to acquit and dismiss the civil lawsuit, as the reference to the reassurance in the assessment of the evidence, as long as it appears from the ruling that Took the fact of the case for sight and insight.
She pointed out that the evidence from the appeal judgment that he took the fact, the circumstances and circumstances of the case and reviewed the evidence, and extracted from all other statements and investigations to reassure him of the innocence of the accused from the accusation against them.