The Prado is a reflection of society. You will have read it here to the director of the Museum, Miguel Falomir, who in his most answering interview response minimizes the question about a possible feminist review of the collections.

- The Prado has been macho , yes, as has been the society. But neither more.

This is a verdict of indictment, a paradigm of rhetoric not only for what it says but for what it does not say, something of enormous significance in a social moment where everything is said to say nothing. Much old, nothing new, at least.

You will have noticed the (one) deduction of these premises: if the Prado has been macho, it is no longer. Or not so much. And by extension neither society. This order is important for a certain feminism that infers the whole through the particular case (manual fallacy logic, you will say). This has been baptized as liberal feminism . As you doubt about its effectiveness, here is a factual example of what liberal feminism has achieved in terms of freedom; or of his coercion, which, as you will see, gives so much.

Interviewed the vice mayor of the capital in the Ser, Begoña Villacís stole the journalist's pen with constructive eagerness: to advise her a question. The interviewer, Javier Casal, must be a patriarchal oppressor of those, because oblivious to social advances he goes and, without condescension, releases:

- I will say it because as people are watching me here in streaming ... You have put me Valdemingómez. I don't know if you are dictating the question or want to do the interview. But as it is an important issue I am going to ask.

If it is an important issue and people have already seen it, why is this harassment? She, kind, aware that her interlocutor has been portrayed, answers without hesitation:

-I'm glad you asked me that question, Javier [the condescension of the vocative].

That a woman in 2019 dares to guide a confused information professional has little to do with the urgency of placing a political message or revealing the anxious tic of the guardian of liberty, as the caveman cipotudos hint. What Villacís has been an act of rebellion , a liberal mansplaining , of those who show that there is no weak sex, but fair freedom.

Arrimadas said in his day that where there is more freedom there is more feminism . The same is the other way around, but it doesn't matter. There are also those who believe that political propaganda and media control makes you invulnerable. Another day we will talk about Ayuso and Telemadrid. Or the same is no longer necessary.

According to the criteria of The Trust Project

Know more

  • Begoña Villacís Sánchez
  • Columnists
  • Opinion
  • Citizens
  • Feminism
  • Isabel Díaz Ayuso
  • Madrid

Turn of the page: Sanchez's frog jump

nothing in writing conservative feminism

TadeuClassic