The Federal Supreme Court rejected the appeal of a psychotropic merchant against a sentence of life imprisonment and deportation from the state after serving the penalty and a fine of 50,000 dirhams, confirming the foundations of the crime against the accused.
In detail, the Public Prosecution referred a defendant to a criminal trial for possession of a psychotropic substance for the purpose of trafficking, demanding that it be punished in accordance with the articles of the Law on Combating Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, and item 65 of Table 8 attached to the law.
The court of first instance ruled that the accused should be sentenced to life imprisonment and fined 50,000 dirhams for what is attributed to him, and the seizure of seizures, and deportation from the state after the execution of the sentence, and upheld by the Court of Appeal, the defendant did not accept the verdict, and he appealed against him, while the Public Prosecution requested to reject the appeal.
For its part, the Federal Supreme Court rejected the appeal, confirming the foundations of the crime against him, as it was based on evidence from his confession that he was arrested when he sold a psychotropic tape containing 12 capsules for 500 dirhams, and from the statements of the two witnesses who testified that secret sources She confirmed that the defendant possesses a quantity of psychotropic substance and sells it, and that he agreed with the secret source to sell a narcotic tape for 500 dirhams.
According to this agreement, a team was formed to seize the accused and provided the confidential source with 500 dirhams. At the specified time and place the confidential source met with the defendant. The defendant handed over the confidential source a psychotropic tape containing 12 capsules, received the agreed amount and was seized in his pocket in his pants. .
The laboratory report proved that these pills belong to the psychotropic drug «Pregabalin» listed in the eighth table item 65 of Law No. 14 of 1995.
The Court found that the conviction of the accused on the charge of possession for the purpose of trafficking came after he included elements of the incident, including the material act and the criminal intent of his pillar, the flag and the will, and the intention of trafficking.
She stressed that the Court of First Instance has the full authority to collect the understanding of the reality in the lawsuit, and to assess its evidence without comment on it, when its judgments are based on evidence of its particular fixed papers and reassured them, and the incident attributed to the defendant got a palatable achievement leading to the conclusion of the outcome, and evidenced. On the commission of the accused, including the assurance to him of certain evidence have a certain fixed papers.