The Federal Supreme Court rejected the appeal of an employee against an appeal ruling, which rejected his request to cancel his decision to house a public relations executive, based on the fact that the ministerial decision to place him on this position was under the discretion of the management, and did not result in downgrading his financial degrees, or damage With his salary.
The court affirmed in its ruling that «the employee's relationship with his employer is an organizational relationship governed by laws and regulations, and that the employee does not have the acquired right to remain in a particular job, but may change his legal status, as required by the public interest, and the Department does not comply with this, but The transfer from his job or accommodation to another shall result in a demotion or misuse of his authority, and it is also established that the employee derives his right to be promoted from the rules governing it, on the basis of which the conditions of such promotion are considered in Employee or not ».
An employee filed a lawsuit, demanding several requests, including the cancellation of a ministerial decision to resettle and relocate staff, and the assignment of experience to indicate the appropriate job grade for his qualification and experience, and the placement of another job and promotion, pointing out that he was a senior inspector, and issued a ministerial decision to resign him as a relationship executive General.
The Court of First Instance rejected the lawsuit, which was upheld by the Court of Appeal, and the employee did not accept the verdict. He appealed against him, explaining that «he was asked to cancel his decision to house a public relations executive without the help of specialized expertise, and that the job does not match his qualifications and experience. On that he was denied the promotion to the highest scores ».
The Federal Supreme Court rejected the appeal, explaining in the rationale that «to obtain an understanding of the reality in the lawsuit from the authority of the court of the subject, when it considers convincing her and consistent and drew the right to the lawsuit based on the justified reasons have a fixed origin of papers, and enough to carry».
She added that «the appeal judgment ended in upholding the judgment of the beginning, rejecting the employee's claim, based on the ministerial decision to place him on this position was under the discretion of the management, and did not result in downgrading his financial degrees or damage to his salary, and that the plaintiff did not specify the degree The demands for promotion to it, and the legal basis from which the right derives from promotion, and on the basis of which the availability of the conditions of promotion is discussed, and that the papers were devoid of the abuse of the administration's authority in all of the above ».