British Prime Minister Boris Johnson's decision to suspend parliament until October 14 is an affront to democracy, the Financial Times said.
She considered that Johnson's request to Queen Elizabeth II to suspend Parliament for five weeks under the pretext of preparing for future government projects is a precedent in the history of the United Kingdom, and an attempt to silence Parliament and prevent him from discussing or stand against a disastrous withdrawal from the European Union without an agreement, a withdrawal scheduled for the end of October Next October.
The decision to suspend parliament undermines the kingdom's long-standing democratic experience, and deprives the parliament and the people on whose behalf Johnson claims it is to decide on a fateful Brexit.
The Financial Times pointed out that the suspension of the work of Parliament in order to schedule the Queen's speech is common in Britain, but for one week or two "and never reached that period of five weeks."
The editorial said the time had come to overthrow Johnson's government by a vote of no confidence and pave the way for elections that would enable the people to express their will.
Parliamentarians should seize the opportunity during next week's parliament session - and talk to the newspaper - to impose the will of the House of Commons in light of the prime minister's unilateral decision.
The Financial Times concluded that the next session may not allow a resolution demanding a postponement of exit from the EU due to time constraints, and that opposition lawmakers should put aside their differences and pass a motion of no confidence in the government.