The Abu Dhabi Criminal Court considered the case of a "Gulf Arab" university professor accused of forging a doctorate from a government university known to an Arab state. The court decided to postpone the case for prosecution witnesses before the court.
The details of the case came back to the discovery of a university in the state that the doctoral thesis of a member of the faculty in the media department is false, and has filed a lawsuit against him, accusing him of forgery, while the discovery of fraud after the publication of the accused on social networking sites received a PhD from an Arab university, And published the names of the supervisors of the letter, prompting one of the supervisors referred to «Dean of the university faculty of the doctoral thesis» to inform his university that the certificate is forged, and did not supervise this letter.
During the hearing, the lawyer paid the defendant to contradict the testimony of the witnesses, in addition to contradicting with the remaining evidence provided by the Public Prosecution, and prompted the disappearance of the elements of the crime of forgery in the doctoral thesis, indicating that the accused was a fraud by an office of educational services located in an Arab country, Procedures for recording the doctoral thesis, and booking the date of the discussion, confirming that this was attended by an employee of the Embassy of the accused, which has added confidence and confidence in the proceedings.
She pointed out that the contract between the accused and the university was a contract for the provision of services and not a contract of work, and that he did not submit a doctoral thesis or documents to the university to fill the post, in addition to The defendant obtained all his financial dues from the university, and acquittal, which confirms that he was not subject to fraud.
A briefcase of dissertation documents, a printed copy of the doctoral dissertation, which the accused discussed, and the cover of the book, dated back to 2016, have been submitted and demanded that he be acquitted of his guilt.
For his part, the accused stressed that all the things that were surrounding him during the preparation of the doctoral thesis was reassuring, especially after accompanying the deputy ambassador of his country on his first visit to the university, where he met with the President of the University, which issued orders to facilitate all things before him for a doctorate, which He spent three years working to complete it.
He complained that he had been defrauded by a printing office that helped him complete the letter. He received a letter from him stating that the discussion was postponed because there was no room in the university.
He pointed out that he was studying for students three subjects, for a salary of 6000 dirhams, noting that he received a call from the Commission on irregularities in the university, and was asked if he knew that his doctorate is false or not, which is a shock for him, the question.
He explained that he has documents confirming his entry and exit to the Arab country where he worked on the doctoral thesis in the place of forgery from 2013 to 2016. The accused explained that the letter was discussed under the auspices of the Dean of the College and not under the supervision, pointing out that the staff in the printing office Oohmoh that the Dean Anabt representative To attend the doctoral discussion.