The Criminal Court in Dubai sentenced five human rights managers to five years in prison for embezzling 18 million and 200,000 dirhams from a company that runs a well-known bakery chain, in cooperation with three other employees, The court sentenced him to a year in prison and acquitted two other Asian defendants, including the director of the company's financial department, for lack of evidence.

The court convicted the chief defendant of manipulating receipts and bills, falsifying government stamps, one of which is the ministry of human resources and resettlement, and bank statements attributed to the bank, and transferring a small fee to millions of dirhams, without being checked by anyone until he set fire to his office. Behind the incident, he was referred to the Public Prosecution, including to the Criminal Court that sentenced him to imprisonment in the incident of the fire, to reveal later a large series of abuses and embezzlement.

The company's assistant manager said that last year, the internal auditor noticed a significant increase in the amounts of money out of the company, especially classified as guarantees for workers. He asked him to address the Ministry of Human Resources and Settlement and the General Directorate of Residency to verify these amounts. To bring a statement of account with the financial amounts of the bakery at the bank located in the residence, but the auditor did not reassure the disclosure, and went himself to the bank, and brought a statement of account, to find significant differences in financial amounts, asked the Assistant Director of the auditor and the first defendant to go together to the bank, From the bakery account, use the accused device electronically present the bank, and extracted revealed identical account records of the bakery, but after several months fire broke out in the first defendant Karama district office, fire experts concluded that fabricated the fire, and was editing a communiqué against him and imprisoned.

He said that the General Directorate of Residency, the Ministry of Human Resources and Emiratisation had been contacted. He was surprised that there were no funds in the account with the Ministry of Human Resources and Emiratisation, and that the bakery was exempted mainly from guarantees, even though the defendant had received deposit receipts amounting to 16 million dirhams To the appointment of two consultants to check the records, and to the existence of tampering documents, and embezzlement by the first accused, assisted by the second accused under his administration, and was assisted in the forgery of papers and seals attributed to the Ministry of Labor.

A witness from an audit firm said that the first defendant modified receipts to double the fees dozens of times. For example, he amended the e-dirham delivery from AED 126,000 to AED 3.9 million.

He also handed over a letter to a finance company worth AED 693,000, with a real value of AED 3,000, to the second and third defendants, who only received the first defendant's receipts, did not ask him for supporting documents or addressed government agencies and asked them to be matched. These circumstances.

- The defendant used an electronic device at the bank, and extracted a statement of account identical to the records of the bakery.