The Court of Cassation in Abu Dhabi has upheld the ruling of the first instance and appeal courts to execute a person who had been killed by a chemical whose wife was burned with a chemical, for refusing to give her a password.
According to a report by the Abu Dhabi District Court, a husband deliberately killed his wife after a 17-year marriage, during which she gave birth to six children, the eldest 16, the youngest of whom were three, The wife was the father and the mother together, because of the husband's misconduct and drug addiction, and imprisonment in financial cases, in addition to the repetition of his marriage.
The wife decided to file a divorce suit after the husband's abuse of her and their children increased, prompting her to accuse her of knowing someone else, and insisted on knowing the password of her phone (the password). When she refused, he decided to kill her.
Investigations have shown that the husband is a drug addict and has been imprisoned more than once. Investigations and reports of telephone conversations and social networking sites during the period leading up to the incident proved that she was innocent of the charges the defendant tried to justify, Person.
The eldest son explained that his father entered the house with a black bag in his hand. He asked him to bring his mother to the council and asked her for the password for her mobile phone. When she refused, she threw the incendiary material from a container inside the bag. She screamed loudly and left the council and his father behind. He left the house without trying to help her or move her to the hospital, despite the knowledge that all of their children were young and the oldest did not reach the legal age to drive the car.
The son pointed out that his mother was begging him and his brothers to save her and asked them to wash with cold water, to ease the pain resulting from the acid, where the body was bloated of acid, and rising smoke, and pieces of her face falling on the ground, and her hair fades, and the smell of her burning body fills the place, Pointing out that the water did not ease the pain, Vkhnha and brothers until burned hands and parts of their bodies and faces.
During the session of the Court of Cassation, the court listed the details of the crime, the investigation and trial proceedings, the ruling of the two courts of first instance and the appeal to execute him as a condensation, pointing out that the defendant objected to the death sentence issued by the Court of Appeal. The verdict was considered to be contrary to Islamic law, His son, which applies to this case, since the victim has male sons of the accused.
The Court of Cassation rejected the objection of the accused and said that the verdict was in a manner consistent with the law. The Court, which pronounced his execution, had violated the validity of the law and justice and the Court of Cassation agreed with the Court of Appeal.
Investigations and the report on the victim's conversations proved her innocence in the accusations made by the defendant to justify his crime.