The trial of 19 people offered 15 stolen vehicles for sale

The Sharjah Criminal Court considered a case involving 19 people of different nationalities on charges of possessing and hacking 15 stolen vehicles, falsifying their papers and selling most of them. Some of them face the charge of possession of stolen vehicles, while others have changed the numbers of their structures, Licenses, and then sell them in amounts exceeding three million dirhams.

The Tribunal faced charges of charges against them, possession of cars obtained from the crime of theft, participation in possession, alteration of structure numbers, and procurement on official contracts with the knowledge of theft.

In the face of one of the accused, he said that he was only a mediator in the sale and purchase of a group of cars, by virtue of his job as a representative of the exhibition of cars, pointing out that he did not know that the vehicles stolen.

One of the defendants admitted possession of five cars with a change in the numbers of its structure, through the installation of numbers of structures different from the original.

In the face of a defendant who testified before the court about the possession of vehicles with the knowledge that they were stolen and the rate of their structures, he admitted that he bought 11 stolen vehicles from a leasing office, then sold them to others unlawfully, and received one million and 800 thousand dirhams from one of the accused , To be paid to the remaining of the total amount agreed upon, the total value of which exceeds three million dirhams.

Some of the defendants denied their knowledge of the case, pointing out that one of them had been named in the case because of his claim to the accused in the amount of more than 900 thousand dirhams, while others confirmed that their role was limited to mediation, do not know that the vehicles stolen, while denied the other four accused the use of a workshop The repairs they are working on to change the "Shassi" numbers of stolen vehicles.

The defense lawyers asked the defendants for a period of time to prepare for the defense, while the prosecution requested the defendants' conviction. In turn, the court postponed the case to April 28, to hear witnesses' statements.