Members of the team of US special investigator Robert Mueller expressed dissatisfaction with comments by Justice Minister William Bar on the investigation into possible Russian intervention in the last presidential election after the Judicial Committee in the House of Representatives to see the full report Mueller.
The Washington Post, citing sources from the Muller team, declined to be identified, saying that the minister's presentation was different from the summary prepared by the investigation team and that the evidence in Muller's report on Trump's obstruction of justice was more troubling than Barr's.
The sources explained that the investigative team Muller prepared summaries of the contents of the report was supposed to be revealed by the Minister of Justice to the public, but wrote another summary of limited information and concluded the innocence of the President.
Trump's lawyer said that what Moller's interrogators expressed expressed the opinion of angry and biased staff and hated the president, he said.
He also stressed that the results of the Muller investigation confirms that there is no impediment to justice by the President or Russian intervention in the presidential election, which he won in 2016.
The House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday approved a memo authorizing the full report of Mueller, threatening to provoke a legal battle over the secret testimony contained in the report that could harm Trump.
Ten days after Justice Minister Trump's acquittal in the report's summary, the Judicial Committee was given days to hand over the full report voluntarily with the documents attached to it, and then told Congress that it was ready to hand over the report by mid- The Democratic-controlled committee voted yesterday to deliver the report in full.
Democrats believe Müller has reason to suspect Trump of justice, and that the people have the right to see the whole picture and not just rely on the justice minister's judgment.