The Federal Supreme Court rejected the appeal of a drug trafficker against a sentence that sentenced him to life imprisonment, a fine of 50,000 dirhams and a state ban on selling two strips of psychotropic drugs for 300 dirhams to a secret police source.
In the details, information was received from the Department of Narcotics Control in the police that a person trading in psychotropic substances had been agreed by the secret source to purchase a quantity of it. The source was provided with 300 dirhams and an ambush was prepared by the control team. The secret source, when he felt the surveillance, asked the secret source to ride the car, where he delivered a tape of mental impact containing 20 pills of the effect and received 300 dirhams, gave the secret source the signal to be caught and searched the suspect found the amount admitted to the secret source and received control team influences The mentality of the subject of the charge.
The forensic report confirmed that "the sample examined is 20 capsules containing the" prigapaline ", a psychotropic substance listed in Schedule 8 of the Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances Act, and the urine sample of the accused contains the compounds of the tetrahydrocannabinol acid.
The Public Prosecution referred the accused to a criminal trial where he was charged with possession of a possession for the purpose of trafficking and the use of psychotropic substances, and was required to be punished in accordance with the articles of the Federal Law on the Control of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances and Tables V and VIII.
The first instance court sentenced the defendant to life imprisonment and fined 50,000 dirhams for the trafficking charge. He was sentenced to one year in prison for the charge of abuse and ordered his expulsion from the state after the execution of the sentence with the confiscation of the narcotic drugs seized and charged by the charges.
The Court of Appeal upheld the verdict, challenging the accused, denying his case, unreasonableness and validity for the absence of any evidence of the fact of receipt and delivery of the mentally ill as the testimony of witnesses is conflicting in the fact of extradition and did not see him handing over psychotropic substances to the confidential source and there are no previous investigations And that what has been seized amounts to him, is to pay debt on the secret source and there is a witness.
The Federal Supreme Court rejected his appeal, asserting that the court of the subject has the full authority to form its doctrine from all the evidence and the elements before it on the basis of research and to extract the correct picture of the case of the case from the testimony of the witnesses and the rest of the evidence and evidence and put what contradicts other images.
The court affirmed that the testimony of witnesses is one of the elements of the court's evidence to be adopted when it is satisfied with these statements, regardless of the nature of the complaint or the suspicions surrounding them. If the witnesses contradicted or contradicted their statements in order to impose their validity, the judgment is not invalidated as long as the court derives the truth from their words. Contradictory.