The UN Refugee Convention has become so shabby and obsolete that it has been thrown into the dustbin of history. The issue of refugees arriving across the Mediterranean throughout Europe has become a matter of manipulation and evasion of responsibility. Any other port, in order to evade the responsibility of receiving them, in the hope that the other port will accept them. This behavior shows how European countries adopt theories of sanctions and racial discrimination against those who seek safe haven, which are in violation of international humanitarian law.

Australia has been the leading country in this field for at least the past two decades, and because it is unable to establish an acceptable policy in dealing with this issue, remains a hostage to the mining industry lobby and is skeptical about the laws in force, its members living in another world , Are engaged in other efforts, such as creating a barbaric policy aimed at repelling those arriving by sea. Boats arriving in Australia are towed to Indonesia, where they make deals with representatives of the country. Australia agrees and pays money to human traffickers, whom Australian politicians say are "scum" when necessary. A barrier of secrecy has been struck with devastating effects on the operations of the Royal Australian Navy, and criminal laws and penalties have been passed on anyone who dares to reveal the nature of detention center operations on Noro and Manos Island.

Mediterranean countries are trying to compete with one another for brutal treatment of refugees. In January, Italian Interior Minister Matteo Salvini said in a scornful tone that the rescue ships heading for Italy were provocative. "No one is allowed to go to Italy," he said in a statement. The comments were accompanied by a change in funding policy. The European Union has distanced itself from Sofia's four-year-old anti-trafficking campaign, which has helped save thousands of refugees using EU vehicles, and after that a united front representing the European Union effectively collapsed to save the refugees.

The refusal to allow refugee boats to dock in EU countries has become a very normal matter. The entry of 62 migrants aboard the German rescue ship «Alan Cordy» to European countries was refused. Following the rescue of the refugees on April 3 near Libya, the rescue ship owned by a German non-governmental organization called Ain al-Bahr encountered difficulties in allowing them to land on land in Malta or Italy at the outset. That the admission of these refugees amounts to the promotion of human trafficking.

After 10 days of torment, an agreement was reached that the refugees on the ship would be allowed to land in Valletta, Malta. As in the case of politicians, the Maltese politicians found it an opportunity to be exploited to their advantage. The head of the government of Malta, Joseph Maskat, claimed that he had won the end of the crisis, rebuking his opponents who support abortion. "Human life is equal. I can no longer tolerate the hypocrisy shown by some who deal with double standards. "

It turned out that the Maltese government was selective in allowing Malta to enter. It refused to enter the crew of the Alain Corrie ship, which meant Malta was happy to rescue the refugees, but wanted to punish the rescuers. "We condemn the use of state power to impose restrictions on crew members who risk their lives to save the lives of refugees," said Gordon Isler, president of Ain Al Bahr. The captain of the ship, Werner Chervinsky, was forced to head for Spain to take off at one of its ports. The obstacles to the movement of the ship were very expensive, meaning that they would not be able to embark on the next task in the middle part of the Mediterranean Sea.

However, the statement issued by the Maltese government revealed the reasons for the acceptance of Malta to receive immigrants, as there are four other countries will share them. "Through coordination with the European Commission and cooperation with Malta, the migrants who arrived in Malta on the ship will now be distributed to four European Union countries: Germany, France, Portugal and Luxembourg," the government statement said.

"This type of negotiation to share refugees is illegal, a bad practice that violates international law and fundamental human rights principles, and undermines the dignity of the refugees who have been saved," said the Ain al-Bahr Association. The law of the sea, international law in general, and human rights law, where these laws provide that the rescued persons must be allowed to leave as soon as possible and the nearest safe place.

The refugee response response system has become a very disconcerting dilemma, and organizations dedicated to saving potential sinking victims are as bad a problem as the victims who save them. People who wish to provide assistance to refugees at sea are at risk of the same assistance they provide to potential victims, which must be protected by the Refugee Right Act. There are routine and bureaucratic issues relating to the area where refugees are at sea, and drowning is inevitable, showing the gravity and importance of the rescue operation.

In many poor cases, the rescue group can find itself in a difficult situation, facing the investigation, because it has provided the assistance that victims desperately need. Firefighter Miguel Rodan, who was assisting the refugees in June 2017, and his fellow rescuers, were investigated by Italian government officials and charged with "facilitating illegal immigration."

Indeed, the looming tragedy is that more and more people will be swallowed by the Mediterranean, given the rapid escalation of hostilities in Libya, where many fear the spread of such hostilities across the Mediterranean to Europe.

- European countries adopt the theories of sanctions

And racial discrimination against arriving refugees

Those who seek safe haven, these

Positions in violation of international law

Humanitarian assistance.

- Countries bordering the Mediterranean Sea

Trying to compete in them on

Dealing brutally with refugees.