The Dubai Criminal Court has launched an Asian investor trial that offered a bribe to an employee of a local bank working for a 100,000 dirham assistant customer service assistant in exchange for a AED 250,000 loan transaction on behalf of an Emirati woman using forged documents, A passport on behalf of the victim, a salary certificate and an account statement, but the employee did not respond to it and informed the competent authorities.

The employee said he had worked for the bank for almost three years and had previous knowledge of the charge when he was working at another bank. He told him that she had a client who wanted to open an account with the bank he worked for, but she lives in Al Ain and can not attend , He told her that she can open an account in the bank branch in Ain.

The employee said that the defendant contacted him again and told him that the woman had opened an account with the bank. She then revealed that she had opened the account on her behalf with false papers and wanted to apply for a personal loan on behalf of the woman. He asked her to help him for 100,000 dirhams. He then contacted the Legal Department at the bank and told them about the incident. They asked him to meet the defendant, and that is what happened, if he contacted her and expressed his desire to cooperate with her, and asked her to come to the bank branch at the Dubai Mall. He pointed out that the defendant provided him with the origin of a salary certificate issued by the municipality of Al Ain, in which she said that the victim is working in addition to a statement of account in her name, and gave him a check issued by the bank on behalf of the victim and signed it in front of him, signed the forms of obtaining the loan, The police officers who had been ambushed were arrested by the police.

The 28-year-old victim said she did not know either side of the incident, whether she was accused of being a female suicide bomber or a bank employee who refused to bribe, saying she did not provide the defendant with any of her personal papers or interview her. The documents submitted for the loan do not belong to her, and she did not sign them, adding that she does not have a bank account, nor did she work at all in the municipality of Al Ain, and does not know why the defendant chose to commit this crime in her name.