<Anchor>

Channel A reporter suspicion of Kang Mi-soo, the prosecutor's investigation deliberation committee yesterday (24th), former reporter Lee Dong-jae passed the trial, and Prosecutor Han Dong-hoon made recommendations to stop the investigation. The Seoul Central Prosecutor's Office, which is investigating, issued an admission statement that it was difficult to understand.

Let's look at the reporter Lee Hyun-young covering this case and analyze it further.

<Reporter> The

prosecutor's deliberation committee yesterday concluded the opposite conclusion about former reporter Dong-jae Lee and prosecutor Han Dong-hoon, who are alleged to be conspired in connection with the suspected attempted attempt by the Channel A reporter.

The former reporter, who had already been arrested, recommended prosecution with a majority of the 15 members, but prosecutor Han Dong-hun said 11 people were to be prosecuted and 10 people had to stop investigating.

The investigative committee made up of outside experts did not admit that the two were accused of conspiracy.

The conclusion of the deliberation is that it is difficult to see the transcripts and training files of the Busan High Prosecution Dialogue on February 13, which the prosecution has designated as key evidence, as evidence of the contest or the circumstances.

A deliberate member told reporters that he met immediately after the meeting that there was no additional data released by the investigation team.

Prof. Dong-Hun Han asked the members of the committee yesterday, saying, "This ridiculous situation is intended to show an example of what happens when an investigation against power is opposed." "Only one of our justice systems is on the side of common sense and justice." It is said to have appealed.

The Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office said that it was difficult to convince the suspect that the investigation had not been completed, but this decision made it difficult to avoid criticism that the investigation was unreasonable.

The decision of the council is not compulsory, but the prosecution has accepted all the recommendations of the council held eight times so far.

Therefore, if the investigation team prosecutes a prosecutor, it is likely that they will face criticism that the prosecution has neutralized the system they created.

(Video coverage: Yang Doo-won, video editing: Park player)

<Anchor>

Reporter Lee Hyun-young is out, but we'll talk more. 

Q. What was the decision of the prosecution investigation committee? 

[Lee Hyun-young/Reporter: Yesterday, the conclusion of the investigation deliberation is that it is a reporter's deviation. The reporter made an inappropriate report, and it is difficult to see until the prosecutor and reporter's adhesion. The opinions of the deliberation committee composed of experts from each field came to this point, and public opinion that attacked Prosecutor Han Dong-hoon and President Seok-Yeol Yoon could face a headwind. Minister Chu Mi-ae was in charge of investigating the investigation. In addition, the leadership of the Open Democratic Party continued to raise so-called'suspect allegations of coalition of prosecutors', saying that it was a political operation involving the prosecution and the media in the general election. And recently in the last two it appears to March was raised suspicion that the relationship with the former Attorney reporter contest based on the conversation transcripts can also establish continuing controversy over the recent KBS news lead.]

Q. opinion of the Review Board results? 

[Lee Hyun-young/Reporter: Prosecutor Han Dong-hoon yesterday in an investigation deliberation, claimed that this case is not a case of adversity, but that it is a so-called adhering case of MBC and certain forces and that I am the victim of the duke. It seems that the deliberation may be fueled by this claim, as the case determines that the crime itself does not hold. At the beginning of the investigation, Yun Seok-yeol also told the investigative team to conduct a balanced investigation, instructing them to thoroughly investigate suspicions of adhering to prosecution, as well as allegations of adhering to advice. In the midst of this, the passport strongly opposes the recommendation of the investigation committee. Passport officials have posted on SNS, and the investigation committee has become a cotton mask for processing or viewing according to the prosecution's taste. And it continues to criticize the operation of the investigation committee as inevitable. There are mixed opinions about the decision of the deliberation committee, and we are interested in the future of how an investigation team will prosecute a prosecutor and how the investigation into suspicion of coalition will proceed.] 

(Video Editing: Lee So-young)