<Anchor>



Another concern in the suspicion of Daejangdong is how much profit the private operators have taken unfairly. Seongnam Urban Development Corporation estimated that 179.3 billion won of money that it should not have been withdrawn from the results of its own investigation.



This is reporter Jeong Ban-seok.



<Reporter> As a



result of the Seongnam Urban Development Corporation's own investigation, the more the project was promoted, the more unfavorable the conditions for profit distribution became.



When asked about the dividend payout in case of additional development profits, the company answers, "The corporation's profits are limited to primary and secondary profit distribution."



Even if additional profits are generated, Seongnam City has drawn a line on its own that it will not take profits.



The same goes for business agreements.



The statement that additional profits would be distributed according to the stake was deleted after 7 hours.



Pointing out these problems, it was determined that insiders, including former general manager Yoo Dong-gyu, conspired with private companies to commit breach of trust.



It was revealed that the Daejang-dong family took 179.3 billion won from these criminal acts.



If the excess profits were distributed according to the investment ratio, Hwacheon Daewoo's share would be 224.6 billion won, but since 403.9 billion won has already been distributed, 179.3 billion won of unfair profit must be returned.



To this end, it is in its position to actively consider litigation for damages and termination of the contract.



In response, Candidate Jae-myung Lee repeated the previous claim that it was a business design that secured enough profits for Seongnam City.



[Lee Jae-myung / Democratic Party Presidential Candidate: It is just an opinion about what the president of the city corporation said.

Some argue that not being able to steal 100% of the development profits is a breach of trust.

If all 100% of the development profits are taken away, why would private investors participate?

There is no reason to do it.]



However, the KAC added that it is a matter for the investigation agency to reveal who is responsible for the breach of trust in the decision-making process.



(Video coverage: Park Jin-ho, video editing: Hwang Ji-young, CG: Seo Dong-min)



▶ Additional prosecution of Yoo

Dong-  

gyu's '65.1 billion breach'...

Kim Man-bae · Nam Wook warrant


▶

Breach

method · amount specified…

Is the upper-level investigation gaining momentum?