A 20-year-old mother who abused her daughter to stand in front of her ex-husband's company for hours in sub-zero temperatures in midwinter was also sentenced to prison in the appeals court.



The reason the woman had her daughter outside was to pressure her divorced ex.



On the 14th, the 1st Criminal Division of the Daejeon District Court (Presiding Judge Yoon Seong-muk) sentenced A (29), who was charged with child abuse, obstruction of business performance, and obstruction of public service, to 1 year and 6 months in prison as in the first trial.



In order to put pressure on her ex-husband B (28), who refuses to unlock the cell phone, Mr. A made his daughter, C (5), stand outdoors in front of Mr. B's company in Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, from February 1 to 6 I am charged with one.



During this process, Ms. C was found to have been standing outdoors in sub-freezing weather for a minimum of about an hour and a maximum of about 13 hours.



When Ms. C was standing, the average outdoor temperature was 1.4 to 7.3 degrees below zero.



When an employee of a child protection agency who received a report of such abuse tried to separate Mr. A and Mr. C, Mr. A assaulted the employee in the process and interfered with work.



Not only this.



On May 12, Mr. A, who escaped and was arrested in response to a police investigation, was also charged with obstructing the execution of his duties, such as holding a police officer by the collar while wearing handcuffs at the police officer's request to move to the center for safety in the convoy. I receive.



It was revealed that A had a history of being sentenced to 10 months in prison and 2 years of probation for child abuse on April 12, 2018, before this case.



At the sentencing hearing held on July 8, the first trial court said, "Mr. A confessed to the crime and showed an attitude of reflection, but he committed the crime even though he had a history of being punished for the same crime." He was ordered to complete a child abuse treatment program and to be restricted from employment at child-related organizations for three years.



However, A was dissatisfied with the judgment of the first instance and filed an appeal.



In response, the court of appeals said, "The crimes such as the details and methods of each crime were never light, and they were not forgiven by the victims except for the staff of child protection agencies." "It seems that the circumstances emphasized by Mr. said.



"The punishment set in the first trial is appropriate and cannot be considered to be outside the reasonable range," he said.



This is a 'news pick'.