Live Last minute of the coronavirus
Pandemic The Wuhan Laboratory, Ground Zero of Suspicions
Covid China responds to accusations against Wuhan: "The virus came from a laboratory ... from the US"
Coronavirus The virus was already circulating in China in October 2019
Facebook will stop banning the publication of theories that claim that covid-19 emerged from a laboratory amid renewed
debate in the United States
about the origins of the virus, raising new doubts about the role of social networks in the verification of information .
"In light of current investigations into the origins of COVID-19 and in consultation with health experts, we will no longer remove from our platforms claims that COVID-19 was
man-made or manufactured,
" the group said, who also owns Instagram, on his website on Wednesday.
The latest movement of the social network, used by some 3.45 billion people on at least one of its four platforms (Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, WhatsApp) contradicts its previous rules on
false information in times of covid-19,
updated in February .
Months ago, Facebook included the
banning of theories that suggested a human creation behind the virus,
as well as the alleged ineffectiveness of the anticovid vaccines or that they could be toxic or dangerous.
"We continue to work with experts to monitor the evolving nature of the pandemic and regularly update our policies as new facts and trends emerge," Facebook said.
The decision comes against a background in which the theory of a laboratory accident in Wuhan, China, has regained traction in the debate in the United States,
after being long dismissed
by most experts.
And calls for further research are multiplying in the scientific community.
US President
Joe Biden
on Wednesday asked his intelligence agencies to "redouble their efforts" to explain the origin of the coronavirus and demanded a report within 90 days.
The natural origin hypothesis holds that the virus
arose in bats and then passed to humans,
probably through an intermediate species.
This theory was widely accepted at the beginning of the pandemic, but scientists have not found a virus in bats or another animal that matches SARS-CoV-2.
Meanwhile, the theory of the laboratory leak is gaining strength, after being initially promoted by former President
Donald Trump
and his entourage, and later dismissed as a political argument.
Days ago,
The Wall Street Journal
newspaper
accessed unpublished US intelligence information, pointing out that three researchers from the Wuhan Institute of Virology -China, where covid-19 was detected- had
already
suffered
symptoms compatible with the
virus
in November 2019. virus.
That is, a month before Beijing reported an outbreak of a rare pneumonia.
The virus then spread around the world, killing nearly 3.5 million people.
"Unsustainable" moderation
Facebook's move highlights controversy over social media efforts to root out misinformation on dynamic topics.
The reversal may be "another sign of the possibility of a change against harsher moderation," tweeted
Evelyn Douek,
a Harvard University professor and researcher on the regulation of online speech.
"When the pandemic started, there were many arguments that 'what platforms are doing for health misinformation, they should be doing for all misinformation all the time.' So it was oversimplified and now it seems unsustainable to me," he said.
Facebook uses third-party independent fact-checkers to debunk misinformation.
Although the origins of the virus remain unproven, the theory of the laboratory leak has been verified. The fact-
checking
organization
PolitiFact
noted last September that public health authorities had repeatedly said that the coronavirus did not originate in a laboratory.
Indeed, following a visit to Wuhan earlier this year, a joint study by the World Health Organization (WHO) and Chinese experts deemed
a laboratory accident
"extremely unlikely."
But the United States and 13 allied countries later expressed "concern" in a joint statement, demanding that China provide "full access" to their data.
PolitiFact's verification was reviewed this month: "That claim is now more widely disputed," he said.
Facebook's backtracking sparked
backlash from conservatives
and Trump supporters.
"Wow! But they did suppress the story for a year, smearing Trump and Republicans for a 'conspiracy theory' that blacklishes the conservative press and outlaws us," tweeted
Kelly Sadler,
blogger and former assistant to Trump.
However,
Rebekah Tromble
, director of the George Washington University Institute for Data, Democracy and Politics, said Facebook "is doing the right thing."
"Information changes over time, and responsible organizations, both social media and fact-checkers,
make decisions based on the best information available,
but remain open and willing to change their assessments as new information emerges." , he pointed.
Separately, Facebook said it was stepping up its efforts against misinformation by limiting users who "repeatedly" share bogus content.
According to the criteria of The Trust Project
Know more
Facebook
Coronavirus
USA
Wuhan
China
Instagram
WhatsApp
Covid 19
PandemicBiden gives 90 days to the US intelligence services to discover how the Covid-19 arose
DefenseThe pandemic forces the cataloging of high-risk biological agents and toxins in Spain
PandemicThe EU, ready to talk about the suspension of patents for Covid vaccines proposed by the US
See links of interest
Holidays 2021
Home THE WORLD TODAY
Stage 18: Rovereto-Stradella, live