• Money So you can know if your telephone company complies with the Internet speed you are paying for

  • Google technology changes the way you log in to Gmail: your password will no longer be enough

Since late 2016,


has touted its printers by

stating that they are compatible with third-party ink cartridges

. A very juicy claim for any consumer, since, over time, the outlay in ink always exceeds the cost of the device itself and

third-party cartridges tend to be cheaper


However, according to the organization of consumers and users (OCU),

a firmware update restricts this option

, causing an

error message to


when a non-brand cartridge is installed

, making the user believe that it is defective. or that the device itself is failing.

In this way, the company "forced them to buy other more expensive ones from HP, or even to replace their printer completely," he says in a statement.

This is why, from the organization, through Euroconsumers (the group to which it belongs), claims HP Inc. to

pay damages to consumers in Spain

, Italy, Belgium, Portugal and Brazil for the incompatibility of their printers with cartridges from other brands.

Specifically, the OCU, together with the sister organizations of the aforementioned countries, asks for up to 150 euros for each affected by this "false promise", following the example of the claims of North American consumers for these same practices, for which

HP agreed to compensate each applicant with between 100 and 150 dollars

(about 83 and 124 euros) for a total amount of 1.5 million dollars (about 1.24 million euros).

In addition, they

ask the company to immediately stop this deceptive and harmful practice for users

, who must buy other cartridges despite what they had been told.

Which is also anticompetitive with respect to other brands and not very sustainable for the environment, since it increases the volume of waste.

In case of not obtaining a satisfactory answer for the consumers, OCU and the rest of the European organizations are ready to

initiate a collective action in order to obtain an



for the consumers.

These types of practices are

directly related to planned obsolescence

, which is not only illegal, but also irresponsible.

"It is unacceptable for HP to take control of consumer devices for its own benefit, reading information from printers and pushing updates without them knowing it," the organization believes, adding that it should be the user himself. you have control over your appliances.

Blockades and lawsuits

In September 2016, a US-based cartridge vendor, LD Products, released a statement stating that its "customer service center was inundated with calls and emails from frustrated consumers that their ink cartridges no longer worked with certain HP printers. ".

HP's response was to reverse its policy of rejecting non-genuine cartridges, confirming the release of a firmware update to

reverse the crash


Years later, in 2018, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) sued the technology company for a similar practice.

In Australia alone,

it sold 220,000 printers

that, after an upgrade, stopped accepting third-party cartridges.

In addition, according to the ACCC, consumers were not informed of the restriction on the use of other brand cartridges

or allowed the option to cancel the firmware update

, for which HP Australia offered a compensation of $ 50.

List of affected printers

The affected printers were:

  • HP OfficeJet Pro 6230

  • HP OfficeJet 6820

  • HP OfficeJet Pro 6830

  • HP OfficeJet Pro 8610

  • HP OfficeJet Pro 8620

  • HP OfficeJet Pro 8630

  • HP OfficeJet Pro X551dw

  • HP OfficeJet Pro X476dw All-in-One Printer

  • HP OfficeJet Pro X576dw All-in-One Printer

  • HP OfficeJet Pro X451dw

These comings and goings of the company, which seem to point towards a future of incompatibility with elements other than the brand itself, continue to this day, with the intervention that gave rise to and

has served as the basis for the OCU's claim


Specifically, on November 17 of last year, the Italian Competition Authority concluded that HP is responsible for the same charges and received a penalty of 10 million euros.

Also the Italian law that allowed that decision, is derived from a European directive, which, in the opinion of the OCU, means that

similar charges can be claimed in other countries of the European Union


According to the criteria of The Trust Project

Know more

  • European Union

InternationalUS denounces Russia's "escalation" in the Black Sea

European UnionThe EU Commissioner for Justice: "The withdrawal of the CGPJ reform is good news, but it is not enough"

EconomyThe bank warns that the cuts will continue: "We have twice as many branches as in the EU"

See links of interest

  • Holidays 2021


  • Genoa - Sassuolo

  • Coosur Real Betis - Barça

  • Movistar Students - Monbus Obradoiro

  • Wolverhampton Wanderers - Brighton and Hove Albion

  • Real Madrid - Sevilla, live