<Anchor>



Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol poured out criticism of the decision regarding the establishment of a serious crime investigation agency that is being promoted by the passport.

In fact, he said it would deprive the prosecution of the right to investigate, and raised his voice as abolishing the rule of law.



This is reporter Won Jong-jin.



<Reporter> In



an interview with a daily newspaper, Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol deliberately criticized the recent proposal for the Severe Crime Investigation Agency that the passport is promoting.



This bill is intended to transfer the investigative powers granted to the prosecution to a major criminal investigation office, and to ensure that the prosecutors only take charge of prosecution and trial maintenance.



In response, Yun strongly criticized the dismantling of the prosecution.



He did not hesitate to express the primary color, saying that it was abolishing the rule of law while wearing a democracy.



When investigating a corruption crime or a person in power in a regime that advocates progress, he asked if it was conservative, and attacked himself with camp logic, revealing unpleasant feelings.



He also argued that if the prosecution fails to respond to crimes in the power class due to the deprivation of the prosecution's right to investigate, fairness and democracy will collapse.



Yoon said that all of these cases would not have been successful if the investigation, prosecution, and trial were separate, citing examples of the 2003 presidential slush fund case, the Lee Myung-bak administration's involvement in the NIS election, and the Gukjeong Nongdan case.



Attorney General Park Beom-gye said that he intends to meet with President Yoon to hear his opinions while avoiding immediate answers.



[Park Beom-gye/Minister of Justice: We know and understand the various concerns of the prosecution members related to the separation of the prosecution and



prosecution

.] A

representative of the Supreme Prosecutors' Office said that it was gathering opinions from the front-line prosecutors' office regarding the deprivation of the prosecution's right to investigate, and that they would also consider making an additional position. .