New The new Telegram tool to take WhatsApp chats with you and not lose messages
Telegram The 11 functions that WhatsApp does not offer
After an ultimatum from WhatsApp that many of its users did not like, the app postponed the modification of its rules on information exchange with its central company, Facebook.
This temporary rectification did not manage to avoid the stampede of users towards other messaging applications and now, with the issue of the processing of personal data on the table, it is time to weigh which application meets the demands of each one.
Telegram offers many functions and has always been the alternative, walking alongside WhatsApp for the past few years.
Such has been the influence that the Facebook application has been implementing new functions that Telegram already included.
On the other hand, another white whale is glimpsed on the horizon, Signal, probably the least known.
Both share some functions and mechanics, however, they differ in terms of the data that link each user.
All three are available in both the Play Store and the App Store, have group chat functions, have cross-platform messaging and allow exchanging files, photos and videos.
They also share encryption for text messages, voice and video calls, specifically WhatsApp decided to use the same end-to-end encryption protocol technology, called Open Whispers Systems, after its success in Signal.
Encryption types
While in Telegram, end-to-end encryption is only activated in the case of using 'secret chats', in WhatsApp and Signal it comes by default in all conversations.
So what kind of encryption does Telegram use in conventional conversations?
Telegram breaks down the data and stores it on servers in different countries, also separating the encryption keys (codes with which a message is decoded, making it legible) from the data.
In this way, court orders from all the countries where Telegram information is stored would be necessary to deliver specific data.
User data
WhatsApp is by far the application that links the most data to each user, not only personal but even habits and consumption.
For example, link phone number to ID, contacts, device ID, purchase history, phone number, location, email, and more.
For its part, Telegram links the user ID with a phone number, contacts, and the account name (a nickname that you can use to communicate with other people without having to provide them with your phone number).
Linking contacts can be useful when you change devices or use it on your computer, it speeds up access.
In the case of Signal, the only data that links to the user's account is the phone number.
It has its pros, if you change a lot of device it can be somewhat uncomfortable, but in terms of privacy, it is almost unmatched.
Privacy and self-censorship
Both WhatsApp, Telegram and Signal share a multitude of functions, so the migration is quite simple, thanks to some interfaces that will be familiar to each other.
Although, for example, there is a peculiar function that Signal has that you will not find in any other, the pixelation of faces.
The application itself offers the option of blurring the faces of people that appear in a photograph.
From the main Signal interface, select the camera-shaped icon at the bottom right, take a photo or select it from the gallery, press the pixelated circle that looks like it has a cross inside and the application will offer you to select the face you want to blur or do it automatically.
This function can also be used to pixelate posters, marks or tattoos.
Different functions
Specifically, the features that
you will
not
find in Signal are: Video notes, animated stickers, channels and mass groups (up to 200,000 participants).
These functions are included by Telegram, although it has a drawback that has been receiving complaints since the creation of the application.
When you create a Telegram account for the first time, it notifies all your contacts, who were already registered in the application, through a direct message.
Something quite indiscreet and uncomfortable.
This option can be disabled, but it is enabled by default.
Contacts
Considering that Signal has most of the functions that you found in WhatsApp, some aspects can make the scale tilt to one side or the other.
For example, the contacts, that is, the application that your family, your friends, your co-workers and even your bosses decide to use.
WhatsApp had been the majority application, so now we will have to see what alternative application your close circles are choosing or take the initiative to tell them what advantages each one offers (or share this same article).
Illustrious recommendations
Shortly after the announcement by WhatsApp of the update in its terms and conditions, a tweet from the well-known tycoon Elon Musk was enough to make Signal gain thousands of users.
The influence of Musk's words on Twitter on the future of shares on the stock market (both his own company and others) is more than known and in this case he only had to say "use Signal".
Not only Musk has positioned himself in favor of this application for privacy reasons.
Signal was recommended by authorities such as the Electronic Border Foundation, a non-profit organization that defends civil liberties in the digital world.
Also, another well-known figure on the subject of secret disclosure, espionage and privacy, Esward Snowden, offered an unquestionable argument for trusting this application: "Here's a reason: I use it every day and I have not died yet."
Open source vs big companies
When delving beyond the functions and chassis of these three applications, that is, pulling the thread and analyzing their origins, it is normal to drown in a sea of purchases, big company names, founders migrating from one to another.
That WhatsApp is owned by Facebook is something that the application itself declares as soon as it is started.
For its part, Signal, previously known as TextSecure, was created in 2010 by computer security specialist Matthew Rosenfeld, also known by his pseudonym Moxie Marlinspike, and Stuart Anderson, robotics specialist.
Years later, it was bought by Twitter and its main creator then founded the new Open Whisper Systems, in order to continue with the developments.
The Open Whispers Systems encryption system was so efficient that WhatsApp itself adopted it.
Later, one of the founders of WhatsApp, Brian Acton, left Facebook and invested $ 50 million in Signal.
In the end everything is related between the tech giants.
Telegram, however, goes a bit on its own terms, it is an open source application founded by two Russian brothers, Nikolai and Pavel Durov, whose development team is currently based in Dubai, since the regulation of the technologies of the information in its country, Russia, requires to provide information about its users and the founders did not accept.
Telegram's operating protocols are open, that is, you can know the computer code on which the application is based and how it has been developed.
A philosophy that it shares with Signal, whose code is available on GitHub in both its mobile versions (Android and iOS) and its desktop version.
In the case of WhatsApp, this type of information, its code, is what is called a 'black box'.
All its 'guts', algorithms and how they work are opaque and inaccessible to both users and ordinary mortals.
According to the criteria of The Trust Project
Know more
WhatsApp
Telegram
Facebook
Twitter
Russia
Elon musk
TechnologyWhatsApp delays changing its conditions of use after the flight of several users to Telegram or Signal
The 11 Telegram functions that WhatsApp does not offer
StoriesDigital minimalism against social media addiction: "If my son were 16, I wouldn't let him have a mobile phone"
See links of interest
Messi contract
Holidays 2021
Spezia - Udinese
Barça - UCAM Murcia
Chelsea - Burnley
Nice - St Etienne
Barcelona - Athletic Club