President Seok-Yeol Yoon protested that the disciplinary committee had already decided on a conclusion and filmed Seok-Yeol Yoon.
He claimed that it was procedurally illegal enough to make a final statement.
Since then, legal action has been announced to administrative litigation, including applications for temporary injunctions to suspend disciplinary action.
This is Hong Young-jae.
Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol argued that the decision of the Ministry of Justice's disciplinary committee was an already announced procedure.
The series of processes, starting with the inspection of President Yoon and leading to the disciplinary committee, was called to capture Yoon Seok-yeol, which was made with a conclusion.
[Attorney Wan-Gyu Lee/President Seok-Yeol Yoon Legal Attorney: I have prepared a lot and tried a lot to get rid of the innocence that there is no reason for disciplinary action. I think this is not
made a problem with the disciplinary committee procedure as illegal.
In particular, Yoon said that he would submit a refutation opinion because there were many different facts in the opinion of the prosecutor's office of the Justice Department, Shim Jae-cheol, who was pointed out as an informant for the alleged investigation by the judge, but claimed that the disciplinary committee had ignored it.
He stressed that even though he filed a request for evasion of the disciplinary committee against Prof. Han-jung Jeong and the anti-corruption chief Shin Seong-sik, the chief prosecutor, he stressed that this was also ignored.
Yoon was reported to have left work yesterday (15th) afternoon after receiving a report that the disciplinary committee may set a deadline in the future.
It is known that specific details regarding the disciplinary action were reported at home late.
President Yoon announced that he would consider whether the disciplinary action was appropriate as the disciplinary committee process revealed the illegality.
In the near future, the dispute between the Ministry of Justice's disciplinary committee and President Yoon's side is expected to lead to court as it is expected to lead to an original lawsuit following an application for a temporary injunction to suspend the effect.