<Anchor> We will
connect with the Supreme Prosecutors' Office to find out more about the disciplinary action of the Prosecutor General, the first in the history of constitution.
Reporter Kim Sang-min, President Yoon Seok-yeol Are you going to work today (16th)?
<Reporter> The
Supreme Prosecutors' stance is that it is not yet known whether President Yun Suk-yeol will be present.
However, there is a high possibility that President Yoon Suk-yeol will go to work today, as there is still a procedure for the presidential appointment for disciplinary action.
'Honesty' was expected to some extent, but the atmosphere inside the prosecutors' office is read by the unprecedented disciplinary decision of the prosecutor general.
Greatsword hasn't released an official response yet.
If the disciplinary action of General Yoon is confirmed, the Deputy Prosecutor of the Supreme Swordsman will take over the duties, and the Deputy Prosecutor of the Supreme Swordsman Nam-gwan Jo publicly expressed his opposition to the request for the disciplinary action of President Yun.
Therefore, I am interested in whether the Ministry of Justice will leave the Deputy Prosecutor Nam-gwan Cho as the acting president, or will appoint another prosecutor's office to the position of the Deputy Prosecutor General's Office.
<Anchor> It
has been very noisy in politics over whether to discipline President Yoon, but it is still early, but has there been any reaction?
<Reporter> As the
result of the disciplinary action came out beyond 4 am, the reaction of the politicians has not yet come out.
The Blue House hasn't shown any reactions, but as I said earlier, as the disciplinary action is confirmed at the home of President Moon Jae-in, there is a possibility that it will be in any way.
The ruling and opposition parties, which had been in sharp opposition over the punishment of President Yun, are likely to clash again.
It is expected that the Democratic Party will emphasize the prompt launch of the airlift as an opportunity to discipline President Yoon, and the power of the people, which the disciplinary committee criticized as a ``people's trial,'' with a de facto result, pushed unreasonable disciplinary action.