court recently decided not to permit a vehicle rally in Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do.
It is believed that even a vehicle rally is concerned about the spread of Corona 19, but it seems that it will also affect the court's judgment on the vehicle rally in downtown Seoul, which was announced on the opening day.
This is Kwon Ji-yoon.
Some residents of Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, insisted on withdrawing the plan to create a Newlywed Hope Town and reported a rally using 99 vehicles.
The police recently disapproved, and the Suwon District Law made the same judgment, saying, "The current period is a critical crossroad to prevent the spread of Corona 19."
The judiciary also listed the recent trend of confirmed cases and said, "Even if it is a vehicle assembly, the possibility of exposure to the risk of infection during the preparation, management and dissolution of the assembly cannot be ruled out. There is."
"At the time this rally is at a critical crossroads in the spread of infectious diseases, the urgent circumstances that must be made are not sufficiently recognized," he said.
The focus was on concerns about the spread of infectious diseases rather than freedom of assembly, and contradicts the purpose of the Seoul Administrative Court's decision that permitted the Liberation Day assembly, saying, "We cannot affirm the spread of infectious diseases caused by the assembly."
It seems that it will also affect the judgment of the Seoul Administrative Court on the opening day of the Seoul vehicle rally, and the government once again announced a policy of strictly restricting the participants of the rally.
[Sae-Kyun Jeong/Prime Minister: Participants in the illegal assembly will be immediately arrested on the spot and responded with the principle of zero tolerance, such as suspension of driver's license.] Even with the
government's notice, some groups are expressing their intention to enforce the assembly, and the Seoul Administrative Court decides what decision Any controversy is expected.