The gynecologist, who was handed over to the court for the death of a child born alive during an illegal abortion surgery, admitted to the wrong, but pleaded that he "would not have lived long after the child was born."

A gynecologist A accused of murder, etc., made the statement on the 11th at the first trial of the appeal held at the Seoul High Court Criminal Division 5 (Jun Kang-Yeol, Jang Cheol-Ik, and Deputy Judge Kim Yong-Ha).

Mr. A tried to abortion a 34-week-old fetus in cesarean section in March last year, but was charged with deliberately dying when the child was born alive.

In the first trial, they were sentenced to three years and six months in prison and three years in suspension.

At the trial, Mr. A's lawyer admitted all the facts of the crime, and insisted that "the adjudication was condemned in the first instance even if a constitutional decision was made against abortion."

He also made a claim to Mr. A that murder crimes should be applied, not murder.

Earlier, the Trial Court judged that the defendant was unable to punish the Constitutional Court for constitutional inconsistency related to abortion, but the constitutional deadline imposed by the Constitution has not arrived, and criminal punishment is possible for abortion.

"Are you admitted to murdering a child born alive?" asked Mr. A in the court's newspaper process. "It wasn't breathless. I wasn't sure I was dead in my stomach."

However, he stressed that he was not intentionally neglecting the child because he was bleeding so much that he could not be interested in the child born to care for it.

Mr. A also complained of the normal episode, saying, "As a result of the previous fetal ultrasound, the child's chances of survival were small as a result of heart disease."

This is also a protest against the prosecution's criticism in the first trial, "The probability of a fetus surviving at birth was 99%. Killing a fetus in this state is an act of killing an abortion."

However, Mr. A said, "It is wrong to operate a fetus that is more than 30 weeks old in any process." It was.

On this day, the judge also conducted a bail interrogation requested by Mr. A.

The defendant said, "The defendant said that the mother's mother had to perform an operation by assessing'Please do an abortion for your daughter's life.' This is a sexual assault.

Currently, the Maternal and Child Health Act allows medically abortions if you are pregnant by sexual assault or semi-sexual assault.

The judge decided to decide whether to bail by combining the opinions submitted by the prosecution and Mr. A's claims.

Mr. A's second trial will be held on the afternoon of the 16th.