<Anchor>

The controversy over whether the donations for the elderly women who were victims of the comfort women were properly spent and whether the government properly explained to the civic groups during the consensus process five years ago. A controversial party, elected US Congressman Yoon Mi-hyang, said he had heard the government's explanation the day before the announcement, but said the toxin was missing.

Reporter Kim A-young.

<Reporter>

On December 28, 2015, the Japanese-Korean comfort women agreement was reached.

Diplomacy officials have been reported in some media at the time that they had consulted with representatives of civil society several decades before the agreement was reached.

First, I asked whether the meeting was held with the director of Ahn Shin-kwon, a Gwangju Sharing House, a little farther from this controversy.

The agreement was only heard on the same day, and it was said that prior contact was about asking for the holiday.

[Anshin-kwon / Housing of Sharing: To explain, you have to sit down with the grandmothers and the grandmothers for hours. But I came for a while, just greeted me, delivered a gift, and came to the ceremony just (and then went)]

Controversial Party President Yoon Mi-hyang met with the SBS reporter and heard the explanation of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on the eve of the agreement, but irreversible agreement, He said there were no mentions of toxins like the demolition of the girl statue.

[Yoon Mi-hyang / CEO of Dae Dae-hyup at the time (Currently elected by the Citizens Party): That ('irreversible consensus, demolition of the girl image, international criticism') was a matter faced by experts by victims and me and related organizations. So everyone was so shocked that day.]

According to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs TF record, which looked back at the comfort women agreement three years ago, the government said it had not contacted victims or organizations more than 15 times, but did not announce any controversial measures.

President-elect Cho Tae-yong, the first Deputy Chief of Security Affairs at the Blue House, said that the Foreign Ministry received a report that he had previously explained to Yoon, but he stepped back saying that the details were unknown.

As it relates to the materiality of the crap agreement, it seems that a responsible public statement from the relevant people is necessary.