The social network service (SNS), in which the identity of suspects related to sexual crimes has been raised, has been attracting attention as the identity of the public and the accomplices of the public and the accomplice of the sexually exploited telegram chat room 'Ph. 

This account posted the first post with a picture of Jo Joo-bin, saying, "I would like to report information about n-room" after Jo Joo-bin's identity was released in March. Subsequently, pictures of Kang Bhu, Kang Hoon and Lee Won-Ho, were published one after another, before the police revealed their identity. 

In addition, a series of posts have been posted on this account claiming to be the identity of these as well as suspects of sexual crimes. There have been more than 14 suspects related to n-room, which have been released so far, and their jobs have varied from university students, public service workers, and office workers.

On the 4th, he posted a post claiming to be a graduate photo of elementary school by Son Jung-woo, the operator of 'Welcome to Video', the world's largest child sexual exploitation site. The account operator posted a post with Son Jung-woo's graduation photo, saying, "Son Jung-woo earned money by selling illegal sites such as Viagra adult chat since middle school." 

Unlike the recently controversial telegram, 'The Scarlet Letter (the new public group chat room related to n room)', it is open to everyone, and the number of followers for the account is 52,000 as of the 6th.
This account explains that the information the account discloses is not a 'picture' but a 'picture'. The account of this account is that "a portrait like a picture" drawn by an unknown author. In the introduction of the account, there is a guide that says, "A collection of pictures drawn on the theme of sex offenders" and "All works can be freely spread. If a person is accused of posting, please contact us because a domestic law firm provides a free defense service."


However, it has been pointed out that this account's indiscriminate disclosure of sex offenders may violate applicable laws. 

A police officer said, "Regardless of whether the information on the account is true or not, distributing personal information online can be punished for defamation."

The prosecution official also said, "The account is a picture, but it does not matter whether it is a picture or a picture. If a post posted on the Internet identifies someone, it can be punished according to the Information and Communication Network Act."  

Earlier, in January, the court convicted an official on the internet site 'Bad Fathers', who has released the identity of parents who are not paying child support. At the time, the court ruled that there was no "defamation or malicious attack." 

However, Bad Fathers was acquitted on the grounds that there was no purpose for slander, but there were opinions that it would be difficult to see that this account 'self' had no purpose for slander. This is because the parent's personal information or a little profanity is written. 

Experts are sympathetic in terms of expressing the anger of the people through digital sex crimes, but they say, "Even if evidence is collected, it cannot be used as evidence if it was acquired illegally. Therefore, it is necessary to trust the investigating authority and wait for the results of the investigation." He pointed out that information disclosure needs to be avoided.  

This is 'News Pick'.

(Photo = 'nbunbang' Instagram)