On the 9th, I reported ["the administrator blocked"…) Securing allegations of Lyme suspicion] There are a lot of fake claims about the press prosecution or the prosecution's report. MBC [Straight] deals with suspicions related to prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol, and the prosecution played media to draw attention to this matter. Even some journalists have been writing publicly to spread such false facts.

▶ (2020.03.09 8news) [single] "靑 administrator blocked". Secure alleged Lyme recording files

KBS Choi management reporter said, "Is it a coincidence that the prosecution foot was reported by SBS before taking the section of 'Prosecutor General and Mother-in-law' at MBC Straight yesterday?" How to play, how to use media rivals, and so on, is very similar to the prosecution's-I think it's playful. " However, in a comment on his post, Choi said, "If the FSS executive comes into the Blue House, it will be one day to ask the FSS, the bank, and so on. It's a single prosecution. It's also a prosecutor's foot. " "Can you give me one or two more smells from my Facebook page?"
Kim Ki-cheol, a journalist of the Maeil Economy, also reported in a report by Kobal News that Mr. Jang Mo's remarks that I reported were "not meaningful in words," and "Why did the prosecution reveal such unsuspecting contents?" It is said that the article reported was "publicly disclosed". In fact, some internet communities, such as Cliang and Baby Dream, have a Facebook post capture of this article. (I didn't see this article when I entered and confirmed the reporter's Facebook page.)

I'm not going to quarrel with Choi to report whether there was a lobby for political relations among the key Lime-related figures, and whether the recording of one of the asylum-seekers was the Blue House administrator A. You can think and evaluate them freely. However, two people should be ashamed of what is obviously not true, that is, the claim that my article is "reported by the prosecution" or "disclosed by the prosecution."

I'll ask. What is the reason for my article being "prosecutor's report"? It is natural for the reporter to confirm with A or confirm with B to say that the information A has told is from B. Probably Choi or Kim believes that when they write articles, Did you hear from the prosecution, or did you hear me from the prosecution that my article was "reported by the prosecution" or "disclosed by the prosecution"? Where did you hear that? I'm really curious.

I'll tell you the truth as it is. I wrote briefly in my Facebook post last 9th, but the recording file I secured was not from the prosecution. Then who gave it to you? The person who gave me the information came out. Mr. Kim is a lawyer on behalf of the victims of the Lyme case.

Attorney Kim Jung-cheol on his Facebook yesterday (10th) "I offered a recording file, what X sound ??? I did not know that Yoon news on mbc news, but I tried to be quiet "I can't stay still. I don't have to investigate this recording even in the Park Geun-hye government. Is it true or not?"
In fact, as a reporter, if you have a basic knowledge, you can guess where you got the recordings by looking at two reports related to Lyme reported by SBS on March 9th. One of the victims reported a recording file that talked to Mr. Jang Moe, a key Lime-related person. Does the victim have a victim lawyer in the report? Even in the middle of the article (although I didn't use screen and voice at the request of the victim), I even interviewed the victim who was a party to the recording.

If this report did not identify the reporter as likely to be the victim's lawyer, Choi's reporter lacked basic skills as a reporter, or his vision was blurred before he wanted to criticize the article. Or knowing and deliberately doing this. In fact, as soon as the article goes out, I know that several reporters asked Kim at a time to ask for a recording. In other words, everyone sees not only people like Choi Management-Kim Ki-chul.

The speculation that MBC [Straight] set the date for the report on March 9 is not true at all. Attorney Kim Jung-chul also said, but last week the publication date of this article was tentatively set to be Monday. I reported the draft of the article the Sunday before, and of course I didn't know what kind of article Straight was going to report. It seems that other journalists are in the same way to adjust the point of view.

It's very sad to say so far, but I don't think that "prosecutor's report" itself is a problem at all. Just as the news reports that the reporter has received information about the police's internal affairs report related to Mr. Yoon Suk-Yeol from an unknown reporter, whether or not the report from the police, should determine the value of the news. Rather, I believe that content should be an important criterion. Nevertheless, I have long explained that my article is not a "prosecutor's report" because of the unfavorable side effects of those they support, conspiracy theories continue to harm society. Those who claim to be reporters are sad to say that.

As you can see from the explanations about the passage, I am tired of reporters who report articles that are against the government. But reporters who don't criticize others for their interests and don't criticize the government don't have to go through that. Nevertheless, I'm going to cover and report more allegations about Lyme. I think we need to show that now that our trust in the media has fallen to the ground, there are not only non-basic journalists in our media. Although not great, I want to show that some reporters keep their basics and do their jobs.

** The reporter Choi Management said on the morning of the 11th that his facebook "SBS report is not a report of a prosecution report, but a testimony of one lawyer that I gave" said "The nature of the suspicion I raised on Facebook is the prosecution It was a press play and my arguments were in fact unfounded. I was guessing.