<Anchor>

On September 6, when the former Attorney General's hearing was held, the prosecution prosecuted Cho's wife, Professor Chung Kyung-Sim, for falsifying the Dongyang University citation. The prosecution was exceptionally prosecuted before the summons investigation was conducted. Later, the prosecution said it would change the complaint in court after major changes, such as the date of the crime and the date of the crime, were made. But today (10th) the court did not accept it.

Kim Ki-tae will explain what the reason is and how it will affect the trial in the future.

<Reporter>

This is why the court has refused to apply for permission to change the prosecution's complaint.

The court said, "In the first indictment, on September 7, 2012, I stated that I had conspired with the bulls at Dongyang University. I can't accept the same.

Although the citation and the guilt seem to be the same in appearance, it is a different case because it does not meet any legal standards recognized as such as accomplice, date, time, place, method and purpose.

The prosecution's refusal continued to warn the court that it could be retired if it continued to resist.

Professor Chung said, "The prosecution was in a hurry to prosecute outside the law for political judgment."

The prosecution says it will consider a separate prosecution of allegations of counterfeiting, even though the court's decision is unfair.

The first complaint is different from the facts, so it is likely to be found innocent, and the court is going to be judged separately by prosecution as the court sees it as a separate case.

Aside from the refusal to change the case, the court said it was unfair for the prosecution not to give the case records to Professor Chung.

(Image editing: Cho Moo-hwan)