<Anchor>

Yes, from now on I will follow the news of the judicial farmers. Today (25th) Our coverage is related to the trial of victims of forced labor in Japan. Nine victims who had to be forced to work in Japan were suing Japanese war criminals. The victims were lost in the first and second seats, but the Supreme Court broke the first and second seats in 2012 and sent the case back to the high court. In the following year, the Supreme Court ruled that the victim shall be compensated from 80 million won to 100 million won per victim. However, starting from here is a little hard to understand. Japanese companies have appealed this ruling again, and the Supreme Court, which received the case again, has been around for nearly five years, but has not concluded yet. This is a fairly unusual situation, and our law enforcement team has been covering it, and here we have found a circumstance that could be called a court case.

First, it is the contents of a report by Ryuan reporters alone.

<Reporter>

The prosecution recently discovered a confidential document entitled "Relations with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of Korea" on the hard disk of the former deputy director of the court administration, Lim Jong-hun.

In September, 2013, this document prepared by the Judicial Policy Office of the Administrative Office of the Court of Justice contained the contents of the Supreme Court judgment in two cases.

The prosecution said that the ruling that lifted the victims' hands would be confirmed as it is. In this case, it is stated that worries about the deterioration of relations with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs are concerned about the extension of overseas judges dispatching and high court judicial proceedings.

On the other hand, it was said that the second case of delaying the lawsuit for overseas service could give the foreign ministry 'procedural satisfaction'.

When I saw that the Supreme Court ruling did not come down for nearly five years, it seemed that the two proposals were adopted.

In one case, I examined the dispatch situation of an overseas judge that the court administration concerned was concerned.

Judges who were suspended in 2008 have resumed their diplomatic missions in 2013.

Judges were dispatched to the United Nations and UNESCO, which had never been sent before.

At that time, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs raised several claims that the Supreme Court should consider diplomatic relations between Korea and Japan.

Therefore, the prosecution suspects that the court has sent an additional mission to the foreign ministers in exchange for delaying the sentence.

The prosecutor's office said it was difficult to confirm the suspicion of the prosecution.

(Image coverage: Shin Dong-hwan, Image editing: Committee member)

▶ "I waited for the time, but it was unfortunate ..."